US · rules
D.D.C. LCvR 83.19
Proceedings Where an Attorney Is Declared to Be Mentally Incompetent or Is Alleged to Be Incapacitated
(a) ATTORNEYS DECLARED INCOMPETENT OR PHYSICALLY INFIRM.
If an attorney who is subject to these Rules has been judicially declared incompetent or
involuntarily committed to a mental hospital, or has resigned from the bar of any court or
been suspended from such a bar on the basis of such mental incompetence or incapacity
or on the basis of physical infirmity or illness, the Disciplinary Panel, upon proper proof
of the fact, shall enter an order suspending such attorney from the practice of law
effective immediately and for an indefinite period until further order of the Court. A
copy of such order shall be served upon such attorney, his/her guardian and the
administrator of any hospital or other institution if the Court is informed such attorney is
a patient thereof in such manner as the Disciplinary Panel may direct.
(b) ATTORNEYS ALLEGED TO BE INCAPACITATED.
Whenever the Committee shall petition the Disciplinary Panel to determine whether an
attorney who is subject to these Rules is incapacitated from continuing the practice of law
by reason of mental infirmity or illness or because of the use of drugs or intoxicants, the
Disciplinary Panel may take or direct such action as it deems necessary or proper to
determine whether the attorney is so incapacitated, including the examination of the
attorney by such qualified medical experts as the Disciplinary Panel shall designate.
Failure or refusal to submit to such examination shall be prima facie evidence of
incapacity. If upon due consideration of the matter the Disciplinary Panel concludes that
the attorney is incapacitated from continuing to practice law it shall enter an order
suspending the attorney on the ground of such disability for an indefinite period and until
further order of the Court.
The Disciplinary Panel may provide for such notice to the attorney or proceedings in the
matter as it deems proper and advisable and may appoint an attorney to represent the
attorney if the attorney is without representation.
(c) CLAIM OF DISABILITY DURING DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.
If during the course of a disciplinary proceeding the attorney contends that he/she is
suffering from a disability by reason of mental or physical infirmity or illness or because
of the use of drugs or intoxicants which makes it impossible for the attorney to defend
adequately, the Disciplinary Panel shall enter an order immediately suspending the
attorney from continuing to practice law until a determination is made of the attorney's
capacity to continue to practice law in a proceeding instituted in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph (b) above.
(d) APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT.
Any attorney suspended under this Rule for incompetency, mental illness, physical
infirmity or because of the use of drugs or intoxicants may apply to the Disciplinary
Panel for reinstatement immediately and thereafter once a year or at such shorter intervals
as the Disciplinary Panel may direct in the order of suspension. The application shall be
granted by the Disciplinary Panel upon a showing by clear and convincing evidence that
the attorney's disability has been removed and that the attorney is fit to resume the
practice of law provided, however, that if the suspension was based on resignation from
the bar of another court the attorney must provide proof that the attorney has been
reinstated in the other court, or that, if the suspension from practice before this Court was
based on a finding of incompetence or incapacity by another court, it clearly appears on
the face of the record that any of the five elements set forth in LCvR 83.16(c)(4) exist.
The Disciplinary Panel may take or direct such action as it deems necessary or proper to a
determination of whether the attorney's disability has been removed including a direction
for an examination of the attorney. The Disciplinary Panel may direct that the expenses
of such an examination shall be paid for by the attorney.
If an attorney has been suspended because of a judicial declaration of incompetence or
involuntary commitment to a mental hospital and has thereafter been judicially declared
to be competent, the Disciplinary Panel may dispense with further evidence and direct the
reinstatement of the attorney upon such terms as it deems proper and advisable.
(e) EVIDENTIARY HEARING.
If the Disciplinary Panel holds an evidentiary hearing to determine whether an attorney is
incapacitated or on an attorney's application for reinstatement under this Rule, the
Chairman of the Committee shall appoint one or more members of the Committee to
appear for the purpose of examining and cross-examining witnesses and/or offering proof
or argument pertinent to the issues.
(f) WAIVER OF PHYSICIAN-PATIENT PRIVILEGE.
The filing of an application for reinstatement by an attorney who has been suspended for
disability shall constitute a waiver of any physical patient privilege with respect to any
treatment of the attorney during the period of the attorney's disability. The attorney shall
be required to disclose the name of every psychiatrist, psychologist, physician and
hospital by whom or in which the attorney has been examined or treated since the
attorney's suspension and the attorney shall furnish the Disciplinary Panel with written
consents for such psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians or hospital to disclose such
information or records as may be requested by the medical experts designated by the
Disciplinary Panel.
Provenance
- Source
- www.dcd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
be35784fc0ccba29ed79ce2a1a3a34009a8e8df452c1c393678deb4553f05e4d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.