Bindinglaw

US · rules

D.D.C. LCvR 40.4

Suspension of New Assignments

activein force · 2026-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

A judge shall be relieved by the Calendar and Case Management Committee from any new

assignment of indictments and civil cases accompanied by motions for temporary restraining

orders and preliminary injunctions or civil cases in which an intention to file a motion for a

preliminary injunction is expressed, upon notification by the judge or the Chief Judge to the

Committee that the judge: (1) has continued in a protracted trial or hearing for 10 consecutive

trial days; 2 (2) is confined to a hospital; (3) is confined at home due to illness for seven days; (4)

has had a death in the judge's immediate family; or (5) is performing judicial duties out of this

jurisdiction pursuant to assignment. New cases shall be assigned to the judge in accordance with

normal procedures upon the conclusion of any such condition.

Whenever a judge begins what is expected to be an unusually protracted criminal trial (one

lasting four weeks or more) he or she may refer to the Calendar and Case Management

Committee for routine reassignment such other criminal cases assigned to such judge as the

judge was unable to dispose of prior thereto and which are expected to require disposition

pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act within the time period of the unusually protracted trial.

Provenance

Source
www.dcd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
d5da3f086c0299d33faaace8ed1542cba18f38905c235f89961af5b2691e86ac
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.