Bindinglaw

US · rules

D.D.C. LCrR 57.15

Sanctions Imposed

activein force · 2026-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) COURT OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES.

The Clerk or his/her designee may respond to or describe, in general terms, the process of

creating case assignment decks for the automated case assignment system. In addition,

the Clerk or his/her designee is also authorized to reveal the name of a judge assigned a

case and the procedure by which the assignment was made. No employee of the Court

may reveal to any other person, other than members of the Calendar and Case

Management Committee and the Chief Judge, any list that may show the composition of

any deck. No court employee may number or assign any case other than in the manner

provided in these Rules or in the manner ordered by the Calendar and Case Management

Committee. An employee who violates this provision may be subject to discharge from

service.

(b) THIRD PARTIES.

No person shall directly or indirectly cause, or procure, or attempt to cause or procure, a

court officer or employee to reveal to any person, other than the members of the Calendar

and Case Management Committee, the sequence of the judges' names within each block

of assignment cards, or to number or assign any case otherwise than herein provided or as

ordered by the Calendar and Case Management Committee. A violation of this Rule may

be punished as a contempt of court.

History

COMMENT TO LCrR 57.15(a): This amendment provides the Clerk's Office with sufficient latitude to generally discuss the creation of the case assignment decks. Further, it permits the Chief Judge to be apprised of the composition of any deck.

Provenance

Source
www.dcd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
483760a4c3e6e1e037c0d6ebb35bed4cd494f8fdf20f39cb40ee4796b4ac1e2a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.D.C. LCrR 57.15 — Sanctions Imposed · binding.law