US · rules
D.D.C. LCrR 57.12
Related Cases
(a) DEFINITION.
A related case for the purpose of this Rule means as follows:
(1) Criminal cases are deemed related when (i) a superseding indictment has been
filed, or (ii) more than one indictment is filed or pending against the same
defendant or defendants, or (iii) prosecution against different defendants arises
from a common wiretap, search warrant, or activities which are a part of the same
alleged criminal event or transaction. A case is considered pending until a
defendant has been sentenced.
(2) If a civil forfeiture proceeding is filed concerning a criminal defendant, or a
defendant is charged in a criminal case while a civil forfeiture proceeding is
pending concerning that defendant, the civil and criminal cases are to be deemed
related.
If a judge after suspension based upon 10 consecutive days in a trial or hearing, thereafter
devotes an occasional day to other court business, that judge shall not by virtue thereof be
reinstated in the complete draw.
(3) Civil cases are deemed related when the earliest is still pending on the merits in
the District Court and they (i) relate to common property, or (ii) involve common
issues of fact, or (iii) grow out of the same event or transaction, or (iv) involve the
validity or infringement of the same patent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a
case filed by a pro se litigant with a prior case pending shall be deemed related
and assigned to the judge having the earliest case. However, if a judge in the
interest of judicial economy, consolidates a significant number of similar pro se
prisoner complaints, or has a single case with a significant number of pro se
prisoner plaintiffs, and any of those prisoners later files a new complaint which is
unrelated to the subject matter of the consolidated cases or the multiple plaintiffs'
case, the judge who receives the new case as related may, if he or she chooses
refer the new case to the Calendar and Case Management Committee for random
assignment.
(4) Additionally, cases whether criminal or civil shall be deemed related where a case
is dismissed, with prejudice or without, and a second case is filed involving the
same parties and relating to the same subject matter.
(b) NOTIFICATION OF RELATED CASES.
The parties shall notify the Clerk of the existence of related cases as follows:
(1) At the time of returning an indictment the United States Attorney shall indicate,
on a form to be provided by the Clerk, the name, docket number and relationship
of any related case pending in this Court or in any other United States District
Court. The form shall be mailed to all defense counsel along with the notification
of the arraignment. Any objection by the defendant to the related case
designation shall be served on the U.S. Attorney and filed with the Clerk within
21 days after arraignment.
(2) At the time of filing any civil action, the plaintiff or his attorney shall indicate, on
a form to be provided by the Clerk, the name, docket number and relationship of
any related case pending in this Court or in any other United States Court. The
plaintiff shall serve this form on the defendant with the complaint. Any objection
by the defendant to the related case designation shall be filed and served with the
defendant's first responsive pleading or motion.
(3) Whenever an attorney for a party in a civil or criminal action becomes aware of
the existence of a related case or cases, the attorney shall immediately notify, in
writing, the judges on whose calendars the cases appear and shall serve such
notice on counsel for all other parties. Upon receiving information from any
source concerning a relationship between pending cases, the Clerk shall transmit
that information in writing to the judges on whose calendars the cases appear and
to all parties to the proceeding.
(c) ASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES.
Related cases noted at or after the time of filing shall be assigned in the following
manner:
(1) Where the existence of a related case in this Court is noted at the time the
indictment is returned or the complaint is filed, the Clerk shall assign the new
case to the judge to whom the oldest related case is assigned. If a judge who is
assigned a case under this procedure determines that the cases in question are not
related, the judge may transfer the new case to the Calendar and Case
Management Committee. If the Calendar and Case Management Committee finds
that good cause exists for the transfer, it shall cause the case to be reassigned at
random. If the Calendar and Case Management Committee finds that good cause
for the transfer does not exist, it may return the case to the transferring judge.
(2) Where the existence of related cases in this Court is revealed after the cases are
assigned, the judge having the later-numbered case may transfer that case to the
Calendar and Case Management Committee for reassignment to the judge having
the earlier case. If the Calendar and Case Management Committee finds that
good cause exists for the transfer, it shall assign the case to the judge having the
earlier case. If the Calendar and Case Management Committee finds that good
cause for the transfer does not exist, it may return the case to the transferring
judge.
(3) Where a party objects to a designation that cases are related pursuant to
subparagraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this Rule, the matter shall be determined by the
judge to whom the case is assigned.
(d) REFERRALS TO A SINGLE JUDGE BY THE CALENDAR AND CASE
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE.
Upon a finding by the Calendar and Case Management Committee that two or more cases
assigned to different judges should be referred for a specific purpose to one judge in
order to avoid a duplication of judicial effort, the Calendar and Case Management
Committee may enter such an order of referral. The order shall be with the consent of the
judge to whom the cases will be referred and shall set forth the scope of authority of said
judge. Unless otherwise provided, such an order shall not transfer any cases nor affect
the assignment of future cases.
History
COMMENT TO LCvR 57.12(c)(3): The Court has eliminated the provision in this Rule that permitted a party to appeal to the Calendar and Case Management Committee an individual judge's decision with respect to whether cases are related because the Court does not believe it is appropriate for a party to be able to seek review of a decision of one judge of this Court by three of that judge's co-equal colleagues. As amended, the Rule would make the individual judge's decision final.
Provenance
- Source
- www.dcd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
aa48ce0f5da392016e53667dde9c7dbb7cc07769e2d5452dc2735a94e387546f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.