US · rules
D.C.COLO.LCivR 30.2
Filing Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Limit Examination, or Objection to Discovery Order
(a) Motion for Protective Order or to Limit Examination. Pending resolution of a
motion or request for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) or 30(d), the discovery to
which the motion or request is directed shall be stayed unless otherwise ordered.
A non-prevailing party may be subject to an award of expenses, fees, and costs
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5). However, the filing of a motion to stay all
discovery shall not effectuate a stay unless the motion is granted.
(b) Objection to Discovery Order by Magistrate Judge. An objection under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(a) to an order by a magistrate judge concerning discovery does not
stay the discovery to which the order is directed. A stay of the order shall be
obtained by motion filed with the magistrate judge, and if denied, then with the
assigned district judge.
Provenance
- Source
- www.cod.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
f9abc826b4ebeb6f35e20a02e19af555b5119c10f6ed9532d9d3686a4a55b05b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.