US · rules
Fed. Cir. IOP 12
PETITIONS FOR PANEL REHEARING
In accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 26(a)(1), which states that its provisions apply in
computing any period of time specified in a local rule, one must “[e]xclude the day of the act,
event, or default that begins the period.” Thus, for example, when a voting deadline is seven
working days in this IOP, the day that the clerk distributes the petition is excluded from the seven-day count.
1. Distribution of Petition.
(a) Unless a petition expressly asks for en banc action, it will be deemed to
request only rehearing by the panel. Petitions for rehearing en banc and combined
petitions for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc are first processed as
petitions under this IOP and thereafter may be processed under IOP #14.
(b) Promptly on receipt, the clerk will distribute the petition for rehearing to
the merits panel members with a petition for panel rehearing vote sheet. The
voting deadline will be ten working days following distribution of the petition.
2. Voting.
(a) Panel members who desire no action on a petition need do nothing.
(b) If the clerk does not receive a form from a panel member by the day
following the deadline, that panel member will be deemed to have voted to deny
the petition.
(c) A panel member desiring action on the petition will so indicate on the
petition for panel rehearing vote sheet and send it to the clerk. Copies of the
marked form will be sent to the other panel members, with an attached
memorandum of reasons if desired.
3. Orders.
(a) On the day following the deadline, if the vote of the panel is to deny the
petition, the clerk will forthwith prepare and issue an order if en banc action is not
requested, but if en banc action is requested, the panel order denying the petition
will be withheld and entered in a consolidated order disposing of the petition for
rehearing en banc.
(b) In preparing an order granting the petition, the clerk will include the action
specified by the panel (oral argument; additional briefing; modification of opinion;
etc.). If oral argument is ordered, the clerk will notify the chief judge. If
modification of the opinion is desired, the author of the original opinion will
supply the clerk with an appropriate order.
4. Responses.
(a) When a panel wishes to grant a petition (other than to make mere language
changes without change in result) the clerk will invite a response from the non-petitioning parties and will not issue the order granting the petition until ten
working days following distribution of a response. The response will be
distributed with a new petition for panel rehearing vote sheet with a voting
deadline of ten working days following distribution of the response. During the
period following distribution of a response, a judge may change his or her earlier
vote to grant by distributing a memo to the other panel members and the clerk.
Judges who have not voted, and who continue after receipt of a response to favor
denial, need do nothing. If the invitation to respond is declined, the clerk will
issue the order granting the petition.
(b) A judge may, before the original voting deadline, direct the clerk to request
a response, notifying the other panel members by a copy of his or her petition for
panel rehearing vote sheet. The original voting deadline is stayed pending receipt
of the response. A new voting deadline, ten working days after the clerk
distributes the response, will appear on the new petition for panel rehearing vote
sheet accompanying the response. If the party declines to file a response, the new
date shall be seven working days after the clerk distributes a routing slip indicating
no response will be filed.
5. In General.
(a) When a judge votes to grant a petition “only to make language changes
attached,” the clerk will withhold issuance of an order for seven additional
working days, to enable other merits panel members to review those changes.
Absent contrary notice on a petition for panel rehearing vote sheet, the clerk will
issue the order making the changes attached.
(b) When a panel’s action on a petition is limited to changes in the language of
an original precedential opinion (without change in the result) but the panel deems
the changes major substantive changes, the petition for panel rehearing vote sheet,
any revised opinion reflecting the changes, and any accompanying order
addressing the rehearing request will be circulated to the court under the same
process set forth in IOP #10(5). If the original precedential opinion was
accompanied by a concurring or dissenting opinion, the authoring judge will
communicate those changes to the panel before circulation and the dissenting or
concurring judge will promptly (1) notify the panel that no change will be made in
the dissent or concurrence; or (2) communicate to the panel any changes deemed
necessary to the original dissent or concurrence that should be circulated along
with the revised opinion to the court.
(c) When a senior judge of this court or a visiting judge served on the panel,
that judge will participate in consideration and disposition of a petition. The clerk
will send two copies of the petition for panel rehearing vote sheet to a visiting
judge who authored the panel’s original opinion.
(d) If the panel’s action on the petition involves substitution of a precedential
for an original nonprecedential opinion, the substituted opinion will be circulated
to the court.
History
Date: March 1, 2022
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
57c066d434a6dd975a426090cd0fd2dd8f107e187d81721f60a54b2d4e8b469c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.