US · rules
Fed. Cir. IOP 11
UNIFORMITY OF CITATION
1. The latest edition of the “Bluebook” (UA Uniform System of CitationU) will
ordinarily be followed.
2. Citation of Opinions to Official Reports.
(a) In citing opinions of this court and its predecessors, cite as found in the
UFederal ReporterU:
Doe v. Roe, 000 F.3d 333 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Roe v. Doe, 000 F.2d 222 (Fed. Cir. 1982).
Goutos v. United States, 522 F.2d 922 (Ct. Cl. 1976).
In re Sponnoble, 405 F.2d 578 (CCPA 1969).
(b) Cite official reports of the Court of Claims only when the matter cited was
not published in the UFederal ReporterU and cite official reports of the Court of
Customs and Patent Appeals or the United States Patent Quarterly only when the
matter was not published in the UFederal ReporterU:
Jones v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl. 806 (1972).
Rogers v. Smith, 35 CCPA 47 (1960).
In re John Doe, 33 USPQ2d 336 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
(c) Cite this court’s opinions in appeals from the Court of International Trade
and the International Trade Commission as found in the Federal Reporter; may
also cite U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Int’l Trade Cases
(_____Fed. Cir. (T)_____):
United States v. Roses, Inc., 706 F.2d 1563, 1 Fed. Cir. (T) 39 (1983).
3. Cite Without Periods in CCPA (Modifies Bluebook).
4. In citing opinions of the Court of International Trade, cite as found in the UFederal
SupplementU. Cite official reports of that court, (69 Cust. Ct. 105) or (4 CIT 110), only
where the matter cited was not published in the UFederal SupplementU. In citing opinions of
the Claims Court, cite as found in UClaims Court Reports (Cl. Ct.). For cases appearing in
1 Cl. Ct. 1 through 1 Cl. Ct. 129, cite at the first occurrence in this court’s opinion the
additional corresponding citation of 550 F. Supp. 669 through 555 F. Supp. 403. In citing
opinions of the Court of Federal Claims, cite as found in the UFederal Claims ReporterU
(Fed. Cl.).
5. In government contract cases, cite published opinions of Boards of Contract
Appeals from the publications in which they appear, e.g., UGoodyear Tire Co.U, ASBCA No.
12345, 74-2 BC ¶54321.
6. When an opinion has been published by a trial level tribunal in a recognized
reporter, a citation thereto will be entered in the opinion of this court disposing of the
appeal. When a slip opinion has been issued by a trial level tribunal and is intended for
publication in a recognized reporter, but has not appeared in such reporter when our
opinion is ready for issuance, the date and case number of the slip opinion will be cited in
the opinion of this court. Issuance of opinions of this court will not be delayed by an
effort to comply with this paragraph.
7. In citing patent and trademark opinions of other courts, cite as found in UFederal
ReporterU or UFederal SupplementU.
8. Opinions of the Supreme Court and of this court relating to this court’s exclusive
jurisdiction should be cited as precedent, in preference to opinions of courts no longer
having jurisdiction over the subject matter with which the citation is concerned.
9. Respect for the tribunals from whose judgments and decisions appeals are taken to
this court requires care in referring to those tribunals in our opinions. Reference should
not be made to “the court below,” “the lower court,” “the lower tribunal,” or “the judge
below.” Reference should be made to, e.g., “the district court,” “the trial court,” “the
district judge,” “the trial tribunal,” or “the court.” The presiding officer in MSPB hearings
is an “administrative judge.”
History
Date: September 22, 2014
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
a1284102ad5f3c416a66eaecb5597e4719ed1d26cc62f9d42c90248e0bdf9219
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.