US · rules
D.C. Cir. R. 47.4
Advisory Committee on Procedures
(a) Establishment of Committee; Membership. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2077(b), there will
be an Advisory Committee on Procedures which consists of not less than 15 members of the bar of
this court selected by the judges of the court in regular active service in such a way as to represent a
broad cross section of those appearing in the federal courts of the District of Columbia, including
representatives from government agencies, law schools, public interest groups, and private
practitioners.
(b) Committee Functions. The committee will, among other things:
(1) provide a forum for study of the internal operating procedures and rules of this court;
Rules 47.3 and 47.4
(2) serve as a conduit from the bar and the public to the court regarding procedural matters and
suggestions for changes;
(3) draft, consider, and recommend, for the court's adoption, rules and internal operating
procedures, and amendments thereto;
(4) render reports from time to time, on its own initiative and on request, to the court and to the
Judicial Conference of the District of Columbia Circuit on the activities and recommendations of the
committee.
(c) Terms of Members. The members of the committee will serve 3-year terms that will be
staggered in such a way as to enable the court to appoint or reappoint one-third of the committee each
year. The court will appoint one of the members to chair the committee.
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
a70eee58de188de0d8f957869c1f8cf359dd5d27ddd16a2546f0e6cbf768e3da
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.