US · rules
9th Cir. R. 21-2
FORMAT OF EXTRAORDINARY WRITS AND ANSWERS; NUMBER OF COPIES; LENGTH
(a) Format: Petitions for writs of mandamus, prohibition or other extraordinary relief
directed to a district judge, magistrate judge, or bankruptcy judge must bear the title of
the appropriate court and may not bear the name of the judge as respondent in the
caption. Petitions must include in the caption: the name of each petitioner; the name of
the appropriate court as respondent; and the name of each real party in interest. Other
petitions for extraordinary writs must include in the caption: the name of each petitioner
FRAP 21
and the name of each appropriate adverse party below as respondent. (Rev. 7/1/00; Rev.
12/1/16)
(b) Number of Copies: Unrepresented parties must file an original in paper format of the
petition, an answer, if ordered, and any supporting papers and appendices. A petition or
answer filed by counsel must be submitted via the Appellate Electronic Filing System.
(New 7/1/00; Rev. 12/1/09; Rev. 7/1/13; Rev 12/1/16; Rev. 12/1/24)
(c) Length: Except by permission of the Court, a petition, or answer, if ordered, may not
exceed 30 pages. The documents listed at FRAP 21(a)(2)(C) and FRAP 32(f) are
excluded from the length limit calculation. (New 12/1/16)
Cross Reference:
• Circuit Rule 25-5. Electronic Filing on page 84
• Circuit Rule 32-3. Page/Word Count Conversion Formula for Briefs and Other Documents
on page 142
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
3d5f9093bf6c2d381c0c81f07701d085e75bba62ca716d63074d3e5e0d4ce840
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.