Bindinglaw

US · rules

9th Cir. R. 15-3

PROCEDURES FOR REVIEW UNDER THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRIC POWER PLANNING AND CONSERVATION ACT

activein force · 2025-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

15-3.1. Contents of Petition

A petition for review of a final action or decision of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)

under the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (“Northwest Power

Act”) shall be labeled “Petition for Review under the Northwest Power Act.” The petition must

state on its face the date of the final action or decision from which review is sought, the title (if

one exists), the BPA docket number (if one exists) and the Ninth Circuit docket numbers of any

known petitions for review of the same final action or decision. (Rev. 7/1/13)

15-3.2. Consolidation

FRAP 15

Petitions for review of the same final action or decision under the Northwest Power Act will be

consolidated for briefing and argument. Respondent must file a motion to consolidate all

petitions from the same final action or decision within 10 days after the expiration of the time to

file petitions for review from that final action or decision unless all the petitions already have

been consolidated by the Court or a motion to consolidate all the petitions is pending. Petitions

from related final actions or decisions may be scheduled for hearing before a single panel. (Rev.

7/1/13)

15-3.3. Intervention

Any petitioner in any consolidated case and any party granted leave to intervene in any

consolidated case will be deemed to have intervened in all the consolidated cases.

Notwithstanding FRAP 15(d), motions to intervene may be filed within 30 days of the expiration

of the time to file petitions for review from the final action or decision at issue. A motion to

intervene must state on its face the date of the final action or decision from which review is

sought, the title (if one exists), the BPA docket number (if one exists) and the Ninth Circuit

docket numbers of any known petitions for review of the same final action or decision. (Rev.

7/1/13)

Cross Reference:

• Circuit Rule 1-2. Scope of Circuit Rules on page 1

History

CIRCUIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOTE TO RULE 15 -3 (New 7/1/13) Parties are encouraged to minimize the number of motions to intervene that they file. A petitioner need not file a motion to intervene in petitions challenging the same BPA final action or decision that its petition challenges. A non-petitioner party seeking intervention may file a single motion to intervene – either in any one of the petitions from the final action or decision at issue or in the consolidated petition. The deadline set forth in FRAP 15(d) to file motions to intervene has been relaxed in these cases in order to make this possible. FRAP 15

Provenance

Source
uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
2026-09-18
Content hash
440e4a4c69a54af93e627dd3a1a19bfc67e563f08d78ccb588ff4029fdd55d1b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.