US · rules
9th Cir. R. 15-3
PROCEDURES FOR REVIEW UNDER THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRIC POWER PLANNING AND CONSERVATION ACT
15-3.1. Contents of Petition
A petition for review of a final action or decision of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA)
under the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act (“Northwest Power
Act”) shall be labeled “Petition for Review under the Northwest Power Act.” The petition must
state on its face the date of the final action or decision from which review is sought, the title (if
one exists), the BPA docket number (if one exists) and the Ninth Circuit docket numbers of any
known petitions for review of the same final action or decision. (Rev. 7/1/13)
15-3.2. Consolidation
FRAP 15
Petitions for review of the same final action or decision under the Northwest Power Act will be
consolidated for briefing and argument. Respondent must file a motion to consolidate all
petitions from the same final action or decision within 10 days after the expiration of the time to
file petitions for review from that final action or decision unless all the petitions already have
been consolidated by the Court or a motion to consolidate all the petitions is pending. Petitions
from related final actions or decisions may be scheduled for hearing before a single panel. (Rev.
7/1/13)
15-3.3. Intervention
Any petitioner in any consolidated case and any party granted leave to intervene in any
consolidated case will be deemed to have intervened in all the consolidated cases.
Notwithstanding FRAP 15(d), motions to intervene may be filed within 30 days of the expiration
of the time to file petitions for review from the final action or decision at issue. A motion to
intervene must state on its face the date of the final action or decision from which review is
sought, the title (if one exists), the BPA docket number (if one exists) and the Ninth Circuit
docket numbers of any known petitions for review of the same final action or decision. (Rev.
7/1/13)
Cross Reference:
• Circuit Rule 1-2. Scope of Circuit Rules on page 1
History
CIRCUIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOTE TO RULE 15 -3 (New 7/1/13) Parties are encouraged to minimize the number of motions to intervene that they file. A petitioner need not file a motion to intervene in petitions challenging the same BPA final action or decision that its petition challenges. A non-petitioner party seeking intervention may file a single motion to intervene – either in any one of the petitions from the final action or decision at issue or in the consolidated petition. The deadline set forth in FRAP 15(d) to file motions to intervene has been relaxed in these cases in order to make this possible. FRAP 15
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
440e4a4c69a54af93e627dd3a1a19bfc67e563f08d78ccb588ff4029fdd55d1b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.