US · rules
6 Cir. R. 22
Habeas Corpus and Section 2255 Proceedings — Second or Successive
Applications — Death Penalty Cases.
(a) Certificate of Appealability. A party seeking a certificate of appealability from this court
must do so as soon as possible after the filing of the notice of appeal.
(b) Motion to File a Second or Successive Application Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or § 2255.
(1) Scope. This subrule (b) applies to motions in this court for authorization to file a
second or successive application in the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or
§ 2255.
(2) Motion.
(A) Information Sheet. The clerk will provide an information sheet and
motion form for an applicant who advises that he or she will move for
authorization. The information sheet and motion form is also available on
the court's web site.
(B) What to File.
(i) Form. The applicant must use the court's form. The form is
available on the court's web site.
(ii) Additional Documents. The applicant must file with the motion
the following documents from prior § 2254 or § 2255 proceedings
if they are reasonably available. The court may request respondent
to provide these documents:
• the magistrate judge's report and recommendation; and
• the district judge's opinion.
(C) No Filing Fee. A filing fee is not required.
(3) Response. The respondent may file a response within 14 days after the later of
service of the motion or respondent's service of supporting documentation.
(4) Court Action.
(A) Considering Response. The court may consider an untimely response.
The court need not await a response in a death penalty case where execution
is imminent.
(B) Forwarding Order. The clerk will forward the court's order to the district
clerk.
(c) Death Penalty Cases.
(1) Scope. This subrule (c) applies to applications under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or § 2255
by a person under a sentence of death.
(2) Contacting the Clerk. Counsel must contact the clerk's office by telephone at the
earliest possible time—before filing a notice of appeal if possible —to inform the
clerk of the status of the case and determine the procedures that apply.
(3) Stay of Execution.
(A) Time for Filing Motion. An applicant moving for a stay must do so as
soon as possible after filing the notice of appeal.
(B) Review of Merits on Motion for Stay. The court may conclude it
appropriately can address the merits of the case on a motion for a stay. If
so, the court will order the parties to address the merits in expedited briefs.
The court may grant a temporary stay pending consideration of the merit s
to prevent mooting the case. Any oral argument of the merits will be held
as soon as practicable after briefs are filed.
(4) Emergency Motions. Counsel with an emergency motion or application must file
it with the clerk rather than with an individual judge. The court encourages
telephone communication with the clerk as soon as it becomes evident that an
applicant will seek emergency relief.
(5) Required Documents for Certificate of Appealability or Stay of Execution.
This subrule (c)(5) applies to an application for a certificate of appealability and a
motion for stay of execution. The application or motion must include the
following documents if they are not part of the district court's electronic record:
• available transcripts of the district court proceedings; and
• all state and federal opinions or judgments involving any issue presented to
this court or, if the ruling was not made in a written opinion or judgment,
the relevant portions of the transcript.
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
e9c13e121f0c87f045f28a0f90f2c7a9a07e574de05157d69df2eedd504953fd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.