Bindinglaw

US · rules

3d Cir. I.O.P. 9.4

Court Originated Rehearing En banc

activein force · 2023-01-06 – presentact-effective-date

9.4.1 If, during the circulation of draft opinions pursuant to I.O.P. 5.5.2 and 5.6,

a majority of the active judges who are not disqualified, votes that the case

be considered en banc, the chief judge enters an order for rehearing en

banc.

9.4.2 If, during the period for circulation of draft opinions, one judge has timely

voted for rehearing, another judge may obtain an extension of time to

consider en banc rehearing by circulating a letter asking that the time for

voting be extended for a period not to exceed 5 working days beyond the

8 day (10 day in August) time period. This request results in an automatic

extension. Irrespective of the number of such requests, the voting time

Table of Contents

automatically is extended this one period only, unless the chief judge, upon

application, grants a further extension of time. In death penalty cases, the

times set forth herein may be reduced pursuant to Local Appellate Rule

Misc. 111.7(b).

9.4.3 During the circulation of draft opinions, a judge who does not desire

rehearing or who has no comment is not expected to respond. The active

judge who has written a dissenting opinion is presumed to have voted for

rehearing en banc absent a notification in writing to the contrary.

Provenance

Source
uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
2026-09-18
Content hash
a96956bea13b019ffb74597f6d447ec8967bf2e98717d30e194384c46480972b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.