Bindinglaw

US · rules

3d Cir. I.O.P. 17.2

Judgment Order in Criminal Cases

activein force · 2023-01-06 – presentact-effective-date

JUDGMENT ORDER

After considering the contentions raised by appellant, to- wit, that the

court erred: (1) in refusing to charge on the testimony of an accomplice

as requested by appellant; (2) in admitting hearsay testimony of a witness;

and (3) in refusing to grant a motion of acquittal on the theory of

insufficiency of evidence, it is

ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the judgment of the district court

be and is hereby affirmed.

Provenance

Source
uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
2026-09-18
Content hash
049a531fe1071c604666f708be5b82c4db7e92c9b4e285c54cf7caaf2884fc59
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.