3d Cir. L.A.R. 25.3

Certain personal identifiers must be excluded or redacted from all documents filed with

the court as specified in L.A.R. Misc. 113.12 and Judicial Conference Policy.

Source: None

Cross-references: 3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 113

Committee Comments: New provision in 1995. Amendments made in 2008 regarding

electronic filings. The notice of docket activity generated by

cm/ecf notes whether notice has been sent to opposing parties by

the court’s electronic docketing system. This does not substitute

for a certificate of service.

Table of Contents

L.A.R. 26.1.0 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

26.1.1 Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interest

(a) Promptly after the notice of appeal is filed, each corporation that is a party to an

appeal, whether in a civil, bankruptcy, or criminal case, must file a corporate affiliate/financial

interest disclosure statement on a form provided by the clerk that identifies every publicly owned

corporation with which it is affiliated but which is not named in the appeal. The form must be

completed whether or not the corporation has anything to report.

(b) Every party to an appeal must identify on the disclosure statement required by FRAP

26.1 every publicly owned corporation not a party to the appeal, if any, that has a financial

interest in the outcome of the litigation and the nature of that interest. The form must be

completed only if a party has something to report under this section.

(c) In all bankruptcy appeals, counsel for the debtor or trustee of the bankruptcy estate

must promptly file with the clerk a list identifying (1) the debtor, if not named in the caption, (2)

the members of the creditors' committees or the top 20 unsecured creditors, and (3) any entity not

named in the caption which is an active participant in the proceeding. If the debtor or trustee of

the bankruptcy estate is not a party, the appellant must file this list with the clerk.

(d) In criminal appeals, the government must file a disclosure statement if an organization

is a victim of the crime. If the organizational victim is a corporation, the statement must also

identify any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its

stock to the extent it can be obtained through due diligence. The government may seek to be

relieved from the requirements of this rule by filing a motion demonstrating that compliance is

impossible.

Source: 1988 Court Rule 25

Cross-references: 28 U.S.C. § 455; FRAP 26.1

Committee Comments: The rule was revised and subsection (c) was added in 1995. Prior

Court Rule 25 imposed an obligation upon all parties to civil or

bankruptcy cases and all corporate defendants in criminal cases to

file a corporate affiliate/financial interest disclosure statement. 3d

Cir. L.A.R. 26.1.1(a) limits that obligation to corporate parties

only. The rule also provides that the statement must be filed

promptly after the notice of appeal is filed, and must be made on a

form provided by the clerk. 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1.1(b) retains the

requirement that every party to an appeal disclose the identity of

every publicly owned corporation, not a party to an appeal, that has

a financial interest in the outcome of the litigation. The rule also

specifies that, under these circumstances, a negative report need

not be filed. “In writing” was deleted in 2008 to provide for

electronic filing of the notices. Subsection d was added in 2011 to

Table of Contents

adopt similar provisions of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

12.4.

26.1.2 Notice of Possible Judicial Disqualification

(a) If any judge of this court participated at any stage of the case, in the trial court or in

related state court proceedings, appellant, promptly after filing the notice of appeal, must

separately file with the clerk a notice of the name of the judge and the other action, and must

send a copy of such notice to appellee's counsel. Appellee has a corresponding responsibility to

so notify the clerk if, for any reason, appellant fails to comply with this rule fully and accurately.

(b) A party seeking disqualification of a judge for any other reason must file a motion,

which must comply with FRAP 27 and L.A.R. 27.

Source: 1988 Court Rule 19.1

Cross-references: 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455; FRAP 26.1

Committee Comments: Prior Court Rule 19.1 required appellant to notify the clerk of a

possible judicial disqualification when filing the opening brief. 3d

Cir. L.A.R. 26.1.2 now requires appellant to notify the clerk of

such disqualification promptly after filing the notice of appeal. 3d

Cir. L.A.R. 26.1.2, which was adopted in 1995, adds a requirement

that appellee notify the clerk of any possible disqualification if

appellant fails to do so. “In writing” was deleted in 2008 to provide

for electronic filing of the notices.