US · rules
3d Cir. L.A.R. 15.1
Brief and Argument in Enforcement and Review Proceedings
In any enforcement or review proceeding with respect to an order or action of a federal
agency or board, each party adverse to the agency or board is considered to be the petitioner(s)
and the federal agency or board to be the respondent, solely for the procedural purposes of
briefing and oral argument, unless the court orders otherwise. Nothing in this rule has the effect
of changing or modifying the burden of the agency or board of establishing its right to
enforcement.
Source: 1988 Court Rule 26.1
Cross-references: FRAP 15
Committee Comments: The portions of prior Court Rule 26.1 that were repetitive of FRAP
15 have been deleted. This rule has been designed to expand the
procedure which FRAP 15.1 limits to a single agency, the National
Labor Relations Board, to encompass all federal administrative
agencies.
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
cd0007d8e453316a86dc6140fb349ea2ff0b9ac592ad9904b75abb7d38fbcf89
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.