US · rules
3d Cir. L.A.R. Misc. 113.13
Hyperlinks
(a) Electronically filed documents may contain the following types of hyperlinks:
(1) Hyperlinks to other portions of the same document; and
(2) Hyperlinks to a location on the Internet or PACER, e.g. the appendix, that
contains a source document for a citation. If hyperlinks are used in the brief, counsel must also
include immediately preceding the hyperlink a reference to the paper appendix page. Hyperlinks
to testimony must be to a transcript. A motion must be filed and granted seeking permission to
hyperlink to an audio or video file before such links may be included in the brief or appendix.
Hyperlinks may not be used to link to sealed or restricted documents.
(b) Hyperlinks to cited authority or documents may not replace standard citation format.
Complete citations to paper documents if available must be included in the text of the filed
Table of Contents
document. If a cited reference is available on the internet only, a complete citation to the internet
site must be included in addition to the hyperlink. A hyperlink, or any site to which it refers, will
not be considered part of the record. Hyperlinks are simply convenient mechanisms for
accessing material cited in a filed document. The court accepts no responsibility for, and does
not endorse, any product, organization, or content at any hyperlinked site, or at any site to which
that site might be linked. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality
of any hyperlink.
(c) Hyperlinks do not replace paper copies of the appendix. Four paper copies of the
appendix must be filed in accordance with L.A.R. 30.1.
Source: Model Local Rules
Cross-References: L.A.R. 28 and 30
Comments: Hyperlinks are a connection from one point of electronic data to
another. Because hyperlinks might be to sites outside the control
of the court, the court cannot take responsibility for the viability of
those links, nor does it take responsibility for the content of any
linked site. Because hyperlinks are not considered part of the
record, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user
to some other site does not affect the content of the filed document.
Hyperlinks are a convenient means of accessing material cited in
electronic documents. Any electronically filed document that
contains a hyperlink must also contain the standard citation to the
same material. This requirement ensures that anyone working with
a printed version of the document has the necessary citation, and
that subsequent failure of a hyperlink will not preclude finding the
cited material.
Just as the complete text of a document cited in a brief or other
filing in support of a legal proposition, unless specifically quoted,
is not considered part of the brief, the hyperlink and the site to
which it refers are not considered part of the brief. Thus, they will
not be considered part of the court’s record.
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
7d72fd98cf8bc5a41955fc6f79c7cc538aa6f7bb8667b88962ab90cd5b9868a5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.