Bindinglaw

US · rules

2d Cir. IOP 40.1

En Banc Poll and Decision

activein force · 2024-12-02 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Judges Eligible to Request an En Banc Poll. Only an active judge of the court or a

senior judge who sat on the three-judge panel is eligible to request a poll of the active

judges to determine whether a case should be heard or reheard en banc.

(b) Judges Eligible to Vote in an En Banc Poll. Only an active judge may vote to

determine whether a case should be heard or reheard en banc and whether an en banc

panel, once constituted, should be dissolved. A judge’s status as an active or senior

judge for the purpose of an en banc poll is determined on the date of entry of the en

banc order.

(c) Judges Eligible to Participate in an En Banc Hearing or Rehearing. Only an active

judge or a senior judge who sat on the three-judge panel is eligible to participate in the en

banc hearing or rehearing. A judge’s status as an active or senior judge is determined on

the date of the hearing or rehearing en banc, i.e., on the date oral argument is heard or the

case is submitted.

(d) Judges Eligible to Participate in an En Banc Decision. Only an active judge or a senior

judge who either sat on the three-judge panel or took senior status after a case was heard

or reheard en banc may participate in the en banc decision. A judge who joins the court

after a case was heard or reheard en banc is not eligible to participate in the en banc

decision.

Provenance

Source
uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
2026-09-18
Content hash
f33cd8677bfe8cd86f60f7e9c4cca72b30cb587c23a6986258ee8493551a6557
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.