US · rules
2d Cir. R. 4.1
Continuation of Counsel in Criminal Appeals
(a) Continuation of Counsel. A criminal defendant’s counsel, whether retained or
appointed, is responsible for representing the defendant on appeal unless relieved by this
court. This responsibility includes complying with FRAP and all LRS and IOPs.
(b) Motion to Withdraw – Frivolousness of Appeal. Counsel who seeks to withdraw from
representing a defendant on appeal on the ground that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issues must file a motion and brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), subsequent case law, and this court’s instructions.
(c) Motion to Withdraw – Adverse Decision. Within 14 days after a decision by this court
that is adverse to the defendant, appointed counsel may file a motion in this court to be
relieved of the obligation to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme
Court if counsel has reasonable grounds to believe that the petition would have no
likelihood of success. The motion must be accompanied by proof of service on the
defendant and the government. The motion must also state that counsel has explained to
the defendant how to file a timely petition for certiorari pro se.
(d) Motion to Withdraw – Other Grounds. Counsel who seeks to withdraw from
representing a defendant on appeal on other grounds must proceed by motion as follows:
(1) Advice to Defendant. Before moving to withdraw as appellate counsel, counsel
must advise the defendant that (A) the defendant must promptly obtain other
counsel unless the defendant desires to appear pro se, and (B) if the defendant is
financially unable to obtain counsel, this court may appoint counsel under the
Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. 3006A (CJA). If the defendant desires to appear
pro se, counsel must advise the defendant in writing of the deadlines for docketing
the record and filing the brief. If the defendant is represented by retained counsel
and seeks appointment of new counsel on appeal, retained counsel must ensure
that the defendant receives and completes the appropriate application forms.
(2) Content of Motion. A motion to withdraw must state the reasons for such relief
and must be accompanied by one of the following:
(A) a document or statement showing that new counsel has been retained or
appointed to represent the defendant;
(B) the defendant’s completed application for appointment of counsel under
the CJA or a showing that the defendant has already filed that application
with the court;
(C) if the defendant is currently represented by appointed counsel, a request
that substitute counsel be appointed under the CJA;
(D) the defendant’s signed statement that the defendant has been advised that
the defendant may retain new counsel or apply for appointment of counsel,
and that the defendant does not wish to be represented by counsel but
wishes to appear pro se; or
(E) a document or statement showing that exceptional circumstances prevent
counsel from meeting any of the requirements stated in (A) to (D) above.
(3) Procedure. A motion to withdraw (A) must be accompanied by proof of service
on the defendant and the government, and (B) is determined in accordance with
FRAP 27.
(4) Counsel Not Admitted to This Court. Counsel not admitted to this court who
seeks to withdraw under (d) must contact the clerk’s office before filing the
motion.
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
dc6f1ca89816d3e475de721818b25760dc0b5385fa2234bf598172788a7b4060
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.