US · rules
11th Cir. R. 46-4
Pro Hac Vice Admission
A non-appointed attorney who is representing a client
on a pro bono basis, is otherwise eligible for admission to the bar pursuant to FRAP 46 and these
rules, and also meets the requirements of 11th Cir. R. 46-7, may apply to appear pro hac vice in a
particular proceeding. The following items must be provided:
• a completed Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice form, available at
www.ca11.uscourts.gov, with proof of service;
• a certificate of good standing issued within the previous six months establishing that
the attorney is admitted to practice before a court described in FRAP 46(a)(1); and
• a non-refundable pro hac vice application fee prescribed by the court and posted on
the court’s website.
An attorney may apply to appear before this court pro hac vice only two times.
To practice before the court, an attorney who is not representing a client on a pro bono basis
or who has two times previously applied to appear before this court pro hac vice, must apply for
admission to the bar pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 46-1, unless the attorney is eligible to be admitted for
a particular proceeding pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 46-3.
The clerk is authorized to grant an application to appear pro hac vice in an appeal not yet
assigned or under submission, in such circumstances as determined by the court, when an attorney
meets the requirements of the rules.
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
060ecc47581e396b25c51992baf3a2482bcafbea5f2cad0970eed231f1122df7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.