US · rules
11th Cir. R. 40-3
Form
The form of a petition for panel rehearing is governed by FRAP 32(c)(2).
A petition for en banc consideration shall be bound in a white cover titled “Petition for Rehearing
(or Hearing) En Banc.” A petition for en banc consideration shall contain the following items in this
sequence:
(a) a cover page as described in 11th Cir. R. 28-1(a);
(b) where the party petitioning for en banc consideration is represented by counsel, one
or both of the following statements of counsel as applicable:
I express a belief, based on a reasoned and studied professional judgment, that the
panel decision is contrary to the following decision(s) of the Supreme Court of the
United States or the precedents of this circuit and that consideration by the full court
is necessary to secure and maintain uniformity of decisions in this court: [cite
specifically the case or cases]
I express a belief, based on a reasoned and studied professional judgment, that this appeal
involves one or more questions of exceptional importance: [set forth each question in one
sentence]
/s/
ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR
(c) table of contents and citations;
(d) statement of the issue(s) asserted to merit en banc consideration;
(e) statement of the course of proceedings and disposition of the case;
(f) statement of any facts necessary to argument of the issues;
(g) argument and authorities. These shall concern only the issues and shall address
specifically not only their merit but why they are contended to be worthy of en banc
consideration;
(h) conclusion; and
(i) certificate of service, if required by FRAP 25(d).
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
e0c7b142889994b9fa1a795c06cb89b74966102686f83389ebccd8f191b53393
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.