US · rules
10th Cir. R. 40
40.1 Generally.
(A) Panel rehearing is not routine. A petition for panel rehearing
should not be filed routinely. Panel rehearing will be granted only
if a significant issue has been overlooked or misconstrued by the
court.
(B) En banc consideration is extraordinary. A request for en banc
consideration is disfavored. Before seeking rehearing en banc
litigants should be aware and take account of the fact that,
before any published panel opinion issues, it is generally
circulated to the full court and every judge on the court is given
an opportunity to comment. En banc review is an extraordinary
procedure intended to focus the entire court on an issue of
exceptional public importance or on a panel decision that
conflicts with a decision of the United States Supreme Court or
of this court.
(C) Petition for writ of certiorari to Supreme Court. Filing a
petition for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc is not
required before filing a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United
States Supreme Court.
(D) Sanctions. If a petition for panel rehearing or for rehearing en
banc is found to be frivolous, vexatious, or filed for delay, the
court may impose a monetary penalty. Counsel may be required
to personally pay the penalty to the opposing party. See 28
U.S.C. § 1927.
40.2 Petition for rehearing en banc.
(A) Cover. The cover page and title of a petition requesting en banc
consideration must clearly indicate that en banc consideration is
sought.
(B) Attachments. A copy of the panel decision that is the subject of
a request for rehearing en banc must be attached to the petition.
No other documents may be attached unless the petition is
accompanied by a motion for leave to attach additional
documents that identifies the attachments with particularity and
states the reason(s) why they are necessary for the court’s
consideration of the petition.
(C) Untimely request. Untimely en banc requests will be transmitted
to the full court only upon express order of the hearing panel.
(D) Who may vote; en banc panel. A majority of the active judges
who are not disqualified may order rehearing en banc. When en
banc rehearing is granted, the en banc panel consists of this
court’s active judges who are not disqualified and any senior
judge who was a member of the hearing panel, unless he or she
elects not to sit.
(E) Effect of rehearing en banc. The grant of rehearing en banc
vacates the judgment, stays the mandate, and restores the case
on the docket as a pending appeal. The panel decision is not
vacated unless the court so orders.
(F) Matters not considered en banc. The en banc court does not
consider procedural and interim orders. These include, but are
not limited to, stay orders; injunctions pending appeal; and
denials of appointment of counsel, leave to appeal in forma
pauperis, and leave to appeal from a nonfinal order. En banc
requests from these rulings are referred to the judge or panel
that entered the order, in the same manner as a petition for
panel rehearing.
40.3 Hard copies not required.
Hard copies of petitions for panel rehearing or for initial or rehearing en
banc are not required.
40.4 No successive petitions/no reconsideration.
(A) No successive petitions. The court will accept only one petition
for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc from any party to an
appeal.
(B) No reconsideration. No motion to reconsider the court’s ruling
on a petition for panel rehearing or for rehearing en banc may be
filed.
Provenance
- Source
- uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- 2026-09-18
- Content hash
e0674cfb4d246533948dcee141244f7659b657f55177fece4d1ffdb03a11cf1a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.