Bindinglaw

US · rules

N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 3-4

Document Production Accompanying Invalidity Contentions

activein force · 2026-08-11 – presentact-effective-date

With the “Invalidity Contentions,” the party opposing a claim of patent infringement shall

produce or make available for inspection and copying:

(a) Source code, specifications, schematics, flow charts, artwork, formulas, or other

documentation sufficient to show the operation of any aspects or elements of an Accused

Instrumentality identified by the patent claimant in its Patent L.R. 3-1(c) chart;

(b) A copy or sample of the prior art identified pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3(a) which does not

appear in the file history of the patent(s) at issue. To the extent any such item is not in

English, an English translation of the portion(s) relied upon shall be produced;

(c) All agreements that may be related to the accused instrumentality or may be comparable

to a license that would result from a hypothetical reasonable royalty negotiation;

(d) Documents sufficient to show the sales, revenue, cost, and profits for accused

instrumentalities identified pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1(b) for any period of alleged

infringement; and

(e) All agreements that may be used to support the party denying infringement’s damages

case.

The producing party shall separately identify by production number which documents

correspond to each category.

Provenance

Source
cand.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
7fbedf3e3baa89a0bcb930bb88379d20171e0d07e193d3858c9c190bd8c2b685
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.