US · rules
N.D. Cal. Patent L.R. 3-3
Invalidity Contentions
Not later than 45 days after service upon it of the “Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
Infringement Contentions,” each party opposing a claim of patent infringement, shall serve on
all parties its “Invalidity Contentions” which shall contain the following information:
(a) The identity of each item of prior art that allegedly anticipates each asserted claim or
renders it obvious. Each prior art patent shall be identified by its number, country of
origin, and date of issue. Each prior art publication shall be identified by its title, date of
publication, and where feasible, author and publisher. Each alleged sale or public use
shall be identified by specifying the item offered for sale or publicly used or known, the
date the offer or use took place or the information became known, and the identity of the
person or entity which made the use or which made and received the offer, or the person
or entity which made the information known or to whom it was made known. For pre-AIA claims, prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(f) shall be identified by providing the name
of the person(s) from whom and the circumstances under which the invention or any part
of it was derived. For pre-AIA claims, prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) shall be
identified by providing the identities of the person(s) or entities involved in and the
circumstances surrounding the making of the invention before the patent applicant(s);
(b) Whether each item of prior art anticipates each asserted claim or renders it obvious. If
obviousness is alleged, an explanation of why the prior art renders the asserted claim
obvious, including an identification of any combinations of prior art showing
obviousness;
(c) A chart identifying specifically where and how in each alleged item of prior art each
limitation of each asserted claim is found, including for each limitation that such party
contends is governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112(6), the identity of the structure(s), act(s), or
material(s) in each item of prior art that performs the claimed function; and
(d) Any grounds of invalidity based on 35 U.S.C. § 101, indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. §
112(2) or enablement or written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112(1) of any of the
asserted claims.
Provenance
- Source
- cand.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
a0b005ad11270c3a665dbb49da012ade9c0d5e95be589745f58e4eabac7104fd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.