US · rules
N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 72-2
Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge
(a) Form of Objection. Any objection filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(A) must be made as a “Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order
of Magistrate Judge.”
(b) Contents of Motion. Any motion filed pursuant to this rule may not exceed 5 pages (not
including declarations and exhibits) and must include:
(1) A specific statement of the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s findings,
recommendation, or report to which an objection is made;
(2) A statement of the Court action requested;
(3) A statement of the reasons and authority supporting the motion; and
(4) A proposed order.
(c) Service of Motion. The moving party must deliver any manually filed motion and all
attachments to all other parties on the same day that the motion is filed.
(d) Opportunity for Response; Ruling on Motion. Unless otherwise ordered by the
assigned District Judge, no response need be filed and no hearing will be held
concerning the motion. The District Judge may deny the motion by written order at any
time, but may not grant it without first giving the opposing party an opportunity to
respond. If no order denying the motion or setting a briefing schedule is made within
14 days of filing the motion, the motion shall be deemed denied. The Clerk shall notify
parties when a motion has been deemed denied.
Provenance
- Source
- cand.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
c0f9642d82cf195c7dde1efcf6066cf1f3b517fd69211b03cede83fd0cf542d2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.