Bindinglaw

US · rules

N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 33-2

Demands that a Party Set Forth the Basis for a Denial of a Requested Admission

activein force · 2026-05-01 – presentact-effective-date

A demand that a party set forth the basis for a denial of an admission requested under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 36 will be treated as a separate discovery request (an interrogatory) and is allowable

only to the extent that a party is entitled to propound additional interrogatories.

History

Cross Reference To the same effect, see Civil L.R. 36-2. Commentary Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 36, a party is not required to set forth the basis for an unqualified denial.

Provenance

Source
cand.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
9b5c28a9c70886180c215b8218834d76ac56efb4ba27f348dcb24e09bbef75de
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.