US · rules
N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 30-1
Required Consultation Regarding Scheduling
For the convenience of witnesses, counsel, and parties, before noticing a deposition of a party
or witness affiliated with a party, the noticing party must confer about the scheduling of the
deposition with opposing counsel or, if the party is pro se, the party. A party noticing a
deposition of a witness who is not a party or affiliated with a party must also meet and confer
about scheduling, but may do so after serving the nonparty witness with a subpoena.
Provenance
- Source
- cand.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
625e6850209d7844cf6ab06aa2cc9e123889b4c94d6a4e57308f54d380d709af
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.