US · rules
N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 16-9
Case Management Statement and Proposed Order
(a) Joint or Separate Case Management Statement. Unless otherwise ordered, no later
than the date specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), counsel must file a Joint Case
Management Statement addressing all of the topics set forth in the Standing Order for
All Judges of the Northern District of California – Contents of Joint Case Management
Statement, which can be found on the Court’s website. If one or more of the parties is
not represented by counsel, the parties may file separate case management statements.
If a party is unable, despite reasonable efforts, to obtain the cooperation of another
party in the preparation of a joint statement, the complying party may file a separate
case management statement, accompanied by a declaration describing the conduct of
the uncooperative party which prevented the preparation of a joint statement. Separate
statements must also address all of the topics set forth in the Standing Order referenced
above.
(b) Case Management Statement in Class Action. Any party seeking to maintain a case
as a class action must include in the Case Management Statement required by Civil
L.R. 16-9(a) the following additional information:
(1) The specific paragraphs of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 under which the action is
maintainable as a class action;
(2) A description of the class or classes in whose behalf the action is brought;
(3) Facts showing that the party is entitled to maintain the action under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 23(a) and (b); and
(4) A proposed date for the Court to consider whether the case can be maintained as
a class action.
Provenance
- Source
- cand.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
114fec31695fd18eca07da436a88e5ecee70daffa3c9aae2bda29b9f38f411ef
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.