US · rules
N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 11-7
Reciprocal Discipline and Discipline Following Felony Conviction
(a) Required Notice of Change in Status. Any attorney admitted to practice in this
Court or any attorney appearing pro hac vice who is convicted of a felony,
suspended, disbarred, or placed on disciplinary probation by any court, or who
resigns from the bar of any court with an investigation into allegations of
unprofessional conduct pending, must give notice to the Clerk and the Clerk of the
Bankruptcy Court in writing within 14 days of such event.
(b) Order to Show Cause. Unless referred to the Standing Committee on Professional
Conduct, matters subject to reciprocal discipline on the grounds listed in paragraph
(a) above shall be handled as follows:
(1) Whenever a member of the bar of this Court or any attorney appearing pro hac
vice who is convicted of a felony, disbarred, suspended for reasons other than
those noted in Civil L.R. 11-1(g), or who resigns from the bar of any court with
an investigation into allegations of unprofessional conduct pending, the Chief
District Judge will enter an order suspending that member on an interim basis
from practice before this Court and affording the member an opportunity to
show cause, within 28 days, why a suspension or disbarment order should not
be entered. If the attorney files a response stating that imposition of an order of
suspension or disbarment from this Court is not contested, or if the attorney
does not respond to the Order to Show Cause within the time specified, then
the Court shall enter an order of suspension or disbarment.
(2) An attorney who wishes to contest reciprocal discipline must file with the
Court a timely response to the order to show cause. The Chief District Judge
may then act on the matter, order it randomly assigned to another Judge or refer
it to the Standing Committee on Professional Conduct for report and
recommendation. The response to the Order to Show Cause must set forth facts
establishing one or more of the following: (a) the procedure in the other
jurisdiction was so lacking in notice or opportunity to be heard as to constitute
a deprivation of due process; (b) there was such an infirmity of proof
establishing the misconduct as to give rise to a clear conviction that the Court
should not accept as final the other jurisdiction’s conclusion(s) on that subject;
(c) imposition of like discipline would result in a grave injustice; or (d) other
substantial reasons exist so as to justify not accepting the other jurisdiction’s
conclusion(s). In addition, together with the response to the Order to Show
Cause, the attorney must lodge with the Court a certified copy of the entire
record from the other jurisdiction or bear the burden of persuading the Court
that less than the entire record will suffice. This procedure may not be used to
relitigate a felony conviction.
(3) An attorney disbarred, suspended or placed on disciplinary probation under the
reciprocal discipline provisions of this rule may seek reinstatement upon
completion of the period of suspension, disbarment, or disciplinary probation
by filing a petition for admission with the Clerk as provided in Civil L.R. 11-
1(c) and paying the admission fee in accordance with 11-1(d). An attorney
disbarred by reason of a felony conviction may not petition for reinstatement
until at least one year after entry of the disbarment order.
History
Cross Reference See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c), 16(f), 37.
Provenance
- Source
- cand.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
ee0233698d682a2753f1d599c0b608137a733ac9ef576934e7dead06081bf4ee
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.