Bindinglaw

US · rules

C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-9.4

Follow-Up Duty of Counsel

activein force · 2026-06-01 – presentact-effective-date

In the event the Court fails

timely to make its decision or to advise the parties of an intended

decision date, as required by L.R. 83-9.3, counsel shall then file a

joint request with the Chief Judge to establish an intended decision

date. A copy of such request shall be filed in the case.

Provenance

Source
www.cacd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
747dfa8fa6f129211b383184f63e8240417a2d2af2446b507e82bb57240b1651
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-9.4 — Follow-Up Duty of Counsel · binding.law