Bindinglaw

US · rules

C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-16.3

Habeas Corpus - Exclusion, Deportation and Removal Cases

activein force · 2026-06-01 – presentact-effective-date

A next friend petition for a writ of habeas corpus in exclusion,

deportation and removal cases must allege that the petitioner has been

authorized by the applicant for admission or respondent in the

proceedings to file the petition. If the petition is filed by a relative

who is the father, mother, husband, wife, brother, sister, uncle or aunt

of the applicant for admission in the proceedings, that fact shall be

alleged and authorization to file the petition need not be shown.

Provenance

Source
www.cacd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
0d07e94f79e47287bf9d6811b51c9140a4113a0e3a60c53207837b6ff0b1ceac
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
C.D. Cal. L.R. 83-16.3 — Habeas Corpus - Exclusion, D… · binding.law