US · rules
C.D. Cal. L.R. 79-5.2.2
Under-Seal Documents in Non-Sealed Civil Cases
In a non-sealed civil case, no document may be filed
under seal without prior approval by the Court. A person
seeking to file documents under seal must follow the
procedures set forth below in subsection (a), unless someone
else has designated these documents as confidential pursuant to
a protective order, in which event those involved must follow
the procedures set forth in subsection (b). Once the Court has
granted leave to file under seal, documents to be filed under
seal must be filed in accordance with subsection (c).
(a) Documents Not Designated by Another as
Confidential Pursuant to a Protective Order. A
person seeking leave of Court to file some or all of a
document under seal (the “Filing Party”) must file an
Application for Leave to File Under Seal
(“Application”). When possible, the Filing Party should
file the Application in time to receive a determination
before filing the motion or other paper that the proposed
sealed document is intended to support. The Application
will be open to public inspection. It must, however,
describe the nature of the information that the Filing
Party asserts should be closed to public inspection, and
must be accompanied by:
(i) A declaration (1) establishing good cause or
demonstrating compelling reasons why the strong
presumption of public access in civil cases should
be overcome, with citations to the applicable legal
standard, and (2) informing the Court whether
anyone opposes the Application. That the
information may have been designated confidential
pursuant to a protective order is not sufficient
justification for filing under seal; a person seeking
to file such documents under seal must comply
with L.R. 79-5.2.2(b).
(ii) A proposed order, narrowly tailored to seal
only the sealable material, and listing in table form
each document or portion thereof to be filed under
seal.
(iii) A redacted version of any document(s) of
which only a portion is proposed to be filed under
seal, conspicuously labeled “REDACTED
VERSION OF DOCUMENT PROPOSED TO BE
FILED UNDER SEAL.”
(iv) An unredacted version of the document(s)
proposed to be filed under seal, conspicuously
labeled “UNREDACTED VERSION OF
DOCUMENT PROPOSED TO BE FILED
UNDER SEAL,” with any proposed redactions
highlighted.
The declaration and the unredacted version of any
document proposed for sealing will be closed to public
inspection, but the redacted versions of those documents,
the proposed order, and the docket entry text will be
publicly viewable.
The Filing Party must provide a mandatory chambers
copy of the Application and all associated documents as
required by L.R. 5-4.5. The declaration and unredacted
versions of documents for which sealing is sought must
be provided in sealed envelopes, with a copy of the title
page attached to the front of each envelope. The
proposed order must be emailed to chambers as required
by L.R. 5-4.4.2.
If the Application is granted, the Filing Party must
thereafter file the sealed document pursuant to L.R.
79-5.2.2(c). The Clerk will not convert the
PROPOSED sealed document submitted with the
Application into a new filing.
If the Application is denied in its entirety, the
document(s) proposed to be filed under seal will not be
considered by the Court in connection with any pending
motion, unless the Filing Party files an unredacted
version of the document(s) within 3 days after the
Application is denied.
If the Application is denied in part, the document(s)
proposed to be filed under seal will not be considered by
the Court in connection with any pending motion unless
the Filing Party files a revised redacted version of the
document(s) that comports with the Court’s order within
3 days after the Application is denied.
(b) Documents Designated by Another as
Confidential Pursuant to a Protective Order. At least
3 days before seeking to file under seal a document
containing information previously designated as
confidential by another pursuant to a protective order, the
Filing Party must confer with the person that designated
the material confidential (the “Designating Party”) in an
attempt to eliminate or minimize the need for filing under
seal by means of redaction. If the document cannot be
suitably redacted by agreement, the Filing Party may file
an Application pursuant to subsection (a), but the
supporting declaration must identify the material
previously designated as confidential, as well as the
Designating Party, and must describe in detail the efforts
made to resolve the issue. The declaration must be
served on the Designating Party on the same day it is
filed, and proof of this service must be filed with the
declaration. Subsequently:
(i) Within 4 days of the filing of the Application,
the Designating Party must file a declaration
establishing that all or part of the designated
material is sealable, by showing good cause or
demonstrating compelling reasons why the strong
presumption of public access in civil cases should
be overcome, with citations to the applicable legal
standard. If the Designating Party maintains that
only part of the designated material is sealable, the
Designating Party must file with its declaration a
copy of the relevant material with proposed
redactions highlighted. The declaration and, if
applicable, the document highlighting proposed
redactions will be closed to public inspection.
Failure to file a declaration or other required
document may be deemed sufficient grounds for
denying the Application.
(ii) If the Application is denied, the Filing Party
may file the document in the public case file (i.e.,
unsealed) no earlier than 4 days, and no later than
10 days, after the Application is denied, unless the
Court orders otherwise.
(c) After Leave of Court Has Been Granted. Once the
Court has granted leave to file a document under seal, the
Filing Party must thereafter file the document with
whatever motion or other document the under-seal filing
is intended to support. The Clerk will not convert the
PROPOSED sealed document submitted with the
Application into a new filing. The caption of the under-seal document must clearly indicate the authority for
filing the document under seal by including, immediately
under the title of the document: “FILED UNDER SEAL
PURSUANT TO ORDER OF THE COURT DATED
_____”; if filed electronically, the under-seal document
must also be linked, during the filing process, to the order
authorizing its filing. Any document filed pursuant to
this L.R. 79-5.2.2(c) that misstates the basis for filing
under seal may be subject to public disclosure, and may
subject the filer to sanctions.
Provenance
- Source
- www.cacd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
e24191422d1bc9115d3e75523491cc33065b303d3b9904d56348bc2469b3c1d1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.