US · rules
D. Ariz. LRCiv 83.9
Amendment of the Rules of Practice and Procedure
(a) Rules of Practice and Procedure Advisory Committee.
(1) Appointment. The Chief Judge shall appoint members of a Rules of
Practice and Procedure Advisory Committee (Committee) to serve such terms as the
Chief Judge designates. The Chief Judge will appoint a District Judge as the Chair of the
Committee (Chair).
(2) Responsibilities. The Committee shall make reports and
recommendations to the Court regarding the following matters:
(A) The consistency of the Rules of Practice and Procedure
(Local Rules) with the United States Constitution, Acts of Congress, the Federal Rules
and General Orders of the Court; and
(B) Proposed amendments to the Local Rules.
(b) Procedures.
(1) Submission of Proposals. Any person or organization may propose
an amendment to the Local Rules. Proposals should be submitted to the Clerk of Court,
marked to the attention of the Committee. Guidelines for submission of proposals are
available from the Clerk of Court and are posted on the District’s Internet website. For a
proposal to become effective on December 1 of a given year, it must be submitted to the
Clerk of Court by August 31 of the preceding year.
(2) Initial Consideration of Proposals. The Chair will convene the first
meeting of the Committee in September to consider proposals. The Committee will
review proposals for rejection, deferral or recommendation to the Court for consideration.
The Chair will assign drafting responsibility to a Committee member of those proposals
that will be forwarded to the Court. The Committee will forward the final proposed
amendments to the Court by February 28. The Court will decide whether to approve the
proposed amendments for circulation to the bar and the public by April 30.
(3) Comment by the Bar and the Public. Proposed amendments
approved by the Court will be distributed to the State Bar of Arizona and the local
chapters of the Federal Bar Association, published in a local legal publication, made
available to the public at each courthouse in the District, and posted on the District’s
Internet website. Comments from the bar and the public shall be submitted by June 30 to
the Clerk of Court, marked to the attention of the Committee. The Committee will
forward the comments, an evaluation of the comments and the final proposed
amendments to the Court by August 15.
(4) Final Adoption. The Court will adopt, modify or reject the final
proposed amendments by September 30. An amendment is effective as to all cases filed
on or after December 1 of the year in which the amendment was adopted and may apply
to pending cases to the extent it is practical and fair.
(5) Alteration of Timing and Procedure. For cause, the Court may alter
the timing or procedures set forth in this Local Rule by General Order.
(c) Emergency Amendments. When the Court or the Committee determines
there is an immediate need to implement an amendment, including a technical, clarifying
or conforming amendment, the amendment may be adopted by the Court without prior
comment by the bar or the public. The effective date of an emergency amendment is the
date set forth by the Court in the General Order adopting the amendment. Amendments
adopted under this subsection will thereafter be circulated to the bar and the public for
comment and reevaluated by the Committee and the Court for possible revision according
to the deadlines set forth in sections (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this Local Rule.
Provenance
- Source
- www.azd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
a4771f1adf9e24b7f078556b0c1bcec93e9fd7b4d8790e77f0eacb69d3796db7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.