Bindinglaw

US · rules

D. Ariz. LRCiv 83.10

Dispute Resolution

activein force · 2026-09-18 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Consideration of Alternative Dispute Resolution. Litigants in all civil

cases must consider the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) at an appropriate

stage in the litigation. As early as the scheduling conference held under Rule 16(b) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or at any time requested by the parties, the court may

offer or parties may request to refer the action to a magistrate judge for the purpose of

holding a timely settlement conference (mediation), minitrial, summary jury trial, early

neutral evaluation, or other form of ADR. The court may require the parties to

participate only in mediation or early neutral evaluation.

(b) Confidentiality. All participants in a settlement conference or other form

of neutral evaluation referred to and presided over by a magistrate judge must maintain

the confidentiality of the proceedings, unless ordered otherwise by the presiding judge or

magistrate judge. This confidentiality shall not apply to orders setting and regulating the

ADR process.

(c) Disqualification. The provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 455 apply to any

magistrate judge to whom an action has been referred for ADR.

(d) No Delay in Case Processing. No party may offer ADR as a reason to

delay the processing of the case as established in the Rule 16 scheduling order.

Provenance

Source
www.azd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
6db694333b96463572aebdc6712ea0c795ab2d095844d4199007a44ae2a37fad
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D. Ariz. LRCiv 83.10 — Dispute Resolution · binding.law