US · rules
M.D. Ala. LR 16.1
Court Annexed Mediation.
(a) Purpose. This Court has established a program of voluntary mediation to assist
litigants in resolving their disputes prior to trial. The Court stresses that mediation is
completely voluntary and confidential. The Court strictly enforces the confidentiality
of mediation. The Court encourages litigants to consider the salutary benefits of
resolving their dispute at an early stage through voluntary mediation.
(b) Nature of Mediation. Mediation is a process of confidential negotiation through
which parties may often achieve results which could not be obtained through
submission of their case to a jury. Successful mediation saves the substantial time
and expense involved with a trial. Successful mediation allows parties to alleviate the
risk of trial and at the same time permits the parties to play an active role in the final
decision about their case. The mediation process generally involves a joint meeting
with all parties and counsel to discuss the case and each side's position. After this
meeting, the mediator will meet with each side individually for a full discussion of
that side's case. Throughout the process, the goal of the mediator is to assist the
parties in negotiating a settlement. Often the mediator will provide to the parties a
frank, honest opinion about the strengths and weaknesses of their case. Frequently,
an objective viewpoint assists parties in making good decisions about settlement.
Back To Top Of Table Of Rules
Provenance
- Source
- www.almd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
1b1ef4fdb754278e24aa314f08c02565ffedc5d178139e73232cfa637438f6cb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.