US · guidelines
U.S.S.G. Ch. 7, Pt. B
VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Introductory Commentary
The policy statements in this part seek to prescribe penalties only for the violation of the judicial
order imposing probation. Where a defendant is convicted of a criminal charge that also is a basis of
the violation, these policy statements do not purport to provide the appropriate sanction for the criminal charge itself. The Commission has concluded that the determination of the appropriate sentence
on any new criminal conviction should be a separate determination for the court having jurisdiction
over such conviction.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 3584, the court, upon consideration of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a), including applicable guidelines and policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission,
may order a term of imprisonment to be served consecutively or concurrently to an undischarged term
of imprisonment. It is the policy of the Commission that the sanction imposed upon revocation is to be
served consecutively to any other term of imprisonment imposed for any criminal conduct that is the
basis of the revocation.
This part is applicable in the case of a defendant on probation for a felony or Class A misdemeanor. Consistent with §1B1.9 (Class B or C Misdemeanors and Infractions), this part does not apply
in the case of a defendant on probation for a Class B or C misdemeanor or an infraction.
History
Effective November 1, 1990 (amendment 362). Amended effective November 1, 2025 (amendment 835).
Provenance
- Source
- ussc.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- ussg-2025
- Content hash
6062a999cced35fc4a86e0148a69e9716a412fc689c58ec4f8820c3b70980a8a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.