US · guidelines
U.S.S.G. §5E1.2
Fines for Individual Defendants
(a) The court shall impose a fine in all cases, except where the defendant establishes that he is unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay
any fine.
(b) The applicable fine guideline range is that specified in subsection (c) below.
If, however, the guideline for the offense in Chapter Two provides a specific
rule for imposing a fine, that rule takes precedence over subsection (c) of
this section.
(c) (1) The minimum of the fine guideline range is the amount shown in column A of the table below.
(2) Except as specified in paragraph (4) below, the maximum of the fine
guideline range is the amount shown in column B of the table below.
(3) FINE TABLE
OFFENSE A B
LEVEL MINIMUM MAXIMUM
3 and below $200 $9,500
4–5 $500 $9,500
6–7 $1,000 $9,500
8–9 $2,000 $20,000
10–11 $4,000 $40,000
12–13 $5,500 $55,000
14–15 $7,500 $75,000
16–17 $10,000 $95,000
18–19 $10,000 $100,000
20–22 $15,000 $150,000
23–25 $20,000 $200,000
26–28 $25,000 $250,000
29–31 $30,000 $300,000
32–34 $35,000 $350,000
35–37 $40,000 $400,000
38 and above $50,000 $500,000.
(4) Subsection (c)(2), limiting the maximum fine, does not apply if the defendant is convicted under a statute authorizing (A) a maximum fine
greater than $500,000, or (B) a fine for each day of violation. In such
cases, the court may impose a fine up to the maximum authorized by
the statute.
(d) In determining the amount of the fine, the court shall consider:
(1) the need for the combined sentence to reflect the seriousness of the
offense (including the harm or loss to the victim and the gain to the
defendant), to promote respect for the law, to provide just punishment
and to afford adequate deterrence;
(2) any evidence presented as to the defendant’s ability to pay the fine
(including the ability to pay over a period of time) in light of his earning capacity and financial resources;
(3) the burden that the fine places on the defendant and his dependents
relative to alternative punishments;
(4) any restitution or reparation that the defendant has made or is obligated to make;
(5) any collateral consequences of conviction, including civil obligations
arising from the defendant’s conduct;
(6) whether the defendant previously has been fined for a similar offense;
(7) the expected costs to the government of any term of probation, or term
of imprisonment and term of supervised release imposed; and
(8) any other pertinent equitable considerations.
The amount of the fine should always be sufficient to ensure that the fine,
taken together with other sanctions imposed, is punitive.
(e) If the defendant establishes that (1) he is not able and, even with the use
of a reasonable installment schedule, is not likely to become able to pay all
or part of the fine required by the preceding provisions, or (2) imposition
of a fine would unduly burden the defendant’s dependents, the court may
impose a lesser fine or waive the fine. In these circumstances, the court
shall consider alternative sanctions in lieu of all or a portion of the fine,
and must still impose a total combined sanction that is punitive. Although
any additional sanction not proscribed by the guidelines is permissible,
community service is the generally preferable alternative in such instances.
(f) If the defendant establishes that payment of the fine in a lump sum would
have an unduly severe impact on him or his dependents, the court should
establish an installment schedule for payment of the fine. The length of
the installment schedule generally should not exceed twelve months, and
shall not exceed the maximum term of probation authorized for the offense.
The defendant should be required to pay a substantial installment at the
time of sentencing. If the court authorizes a defendant sentenced to probation or supervised release to pay a fine on an installment schedule, the
court shall require as a condition of probation or supervised release that
the defendant pay the fine according to the schedule. The court also may
impose a condition prohibiting the defendant from incurring new credit
charges or opening additional lines of credit unless he is in compliance with
the payment schedule.
(g) If the defendant knowingly fails to pay a delinquent fine, the court shall
resentence him in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3614.
(h) Special Instruction
(1) For offenses committed prior to November 1, 2015, use the applicable
fine guideline range that was set forth in the version of §5E1.2(c) that
was in effect on November 1, 2014, rather than the applicable fine
guideline range set forth in subsection (c) above.
Commentary
Application Notes:
1. A fine may be the sole sanction if the guidelines do not require a term of imprisonment. If, however, the fine is not paid in full at the time of sentencing, it is recommended that the court sentence the defendant to a term of probation, with payment of the fine as a condition of probation.
If a fine is imposed in addition to a term of imprisonment, it is recommended that the court
impose a term of supervised release following imprisonment as a means of enforcing payment of
the fine.
2. In general, the maximum fine permitted by law as to each count of conviction is $250,000 for a
felony or for any misdemeanor resulting in death; $100,000 for a Class A misdemeanor; and
$5,000 for any other offense. 18 U.S.C. § 3571(b)(3)–(7). However, higher or lower limits may
apply when specified by statute. 18 U.S.C. § 3571(b)(1), (e). As an alternative maximum, the
court may fine the defendant up to the greater of twice the gross gain or twice the gross loss.
18 U.S.C. § 3571(b)(2), (d).
3. The determination of the fine guideline range may be dispensed with entirely upon a court determination of present and future inability to pay any fine. The inability of a defendant to post
bail bond (having otherwise been determined eligible for release) and the fact that a defendant
is represented by (or was determined eligible for) assigned counsel are significant indicators of
present inability to pay any fine. In conjunction with other factors, they may also indicate that
the defendant is not likely to become able to pay any fine.
4. Subsection (c)(4) applies to statutes that contain special provisions permitting larger fines; the
guidelines do not limit maximum fines in such cases. These statutes include, among others:
21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b) and 960(b), which authorize fines up to $8 million in offenses involving the
manufacture, distribution, or importation of certain controlled substances; 21 U.S.C. § 848(a),
which authorizes fines up to $4 million in offenses involving the manufacture or distribution of
controlled substances by a continuing criminal enterprise; 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a), which authorizes
a fine equal to the greater of $500,000 or two times the value of the monetary instruments or
funds involved in offenses involving money laundering of financial instruments; 18 U.S.C.
§ 1957(b)(2), which authorizes a fine equal to two times the amount of any criminally derived
property involved in a money laundering transaction; 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c), which authorizes a
fine of up to $50,000 per day for violations of the Water Pollution Control Act; 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d),
which authorizes a fine of up to $50,000 per day for violations of the Resource Conservation Act;
and 52 U.S.C. § 30109(d)(1)(D), which authorizes, for violations of the Federal Election Campaign
Act under 52 U.S.C. § 30122, a fine up to the greater of $50,000 or 1,000 percent of the amount
of the violation, and which requires, in the case of such a violation, a minimum fine of not less
than 300 percent of the amount of the violation.
There may be cases in which the defendant has entered into a conciliation agreement with the
Federal Election Commission under section 309 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 in
order to correct or prevent a violation of such Act by the defendant. The existence of a conciliation
agreement between the defendant and Federal Election Commission, and the extent of compliance with that conciliation agreement, may be appropriate factors in determining at what point
within the applicable fine guideline range to sentence the defendant, unless the defendant began
negotiations toward a conciliation agreement after becoming aware of a criminal investigation.
5. The existence of income or assets that the defendant failed to disclose may justify a larger fine
than that which otherwise would be warranted under this section. The court may base its conclusion as to this factor on information revealing significant unexplained expenditures by the
defendant or unexplained possession of assets that do not comport with the defendant’s reported
income. If the court concludes that the defendant willfully misrepresented all or part of his income or assets, it may increase the offense level and resulting sentence in accordance with Chapter Three, Part C (Obstruction and Related Adjustments).
6. In considering subsection (d)(7), the court may be guided by reports published by the Bureau of
Prisons and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts concerning average costs.
History
Effective November 1, 1987. Amended effective January 15, 1988 (amendment 54); November 1, 1989 (amendments 280, 281, and 302); November 1, 1990 (amendment 356); November 1, 1991 (amend- ment 384); November 1, 1997 (amendment 572); November 1, 2002 (amendment 646); January 25, 2003 (amendment 648); November 1, 2003 (amendment 656); November 1, 2011 (amendment 758); November 1, 2015 (amendments 791 and 796); November 1, 2024 (amendment 831); November 1, 2025 (amendment 836).
Provenance
- Source
- ussc.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- ussg-2025
- Content hash
3d7e5fb2012536503f9b60c82f193826f3aeb50663e495dc519fcdac09c3dfc2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.