US · guidelines
U.S.S.G. §3A1.2
Official Victim
(Apply the greatest):
(a) If (1) the victim was (A) a government officer or employee; (B) a former
government officer or employee; or (C) a member of the immediate family
of a person described in subdivision (A) or (B); and (2) the offense of conviction was motivated by such status, increase by 3 levels.
(b) If subsection (a)(1) and (2) apply, and the applicable Chapter Two guideline
is from Chapter Two, Part A (Offenses Against the Person), increase by
6 levels.
(c) If, in a manner creating a substantial risk of serious bodily injury, the defendant or a person for whose conduct the defendant is otherwise accountable—
(1) knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that a person was a
law enforcement officer, assaulted such officer during the course of
the offense or immediate flight therefrom; or
(2) knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that a person was a
prison official, assaulted such official while the defendant (or a person
for whose conduct the defendant is otherwise accountable) was in the
custody or control of a prison or other correctional facility,
increase by 6 levels.
Commentary
Application Notes:
1. Applicability to Certain Victims.—This guideline applies when specified individuals are victims of the offense. This guideline does not apply when the only victim is an organization, agency,
or the government.
2. Nonapplicability in Case of Incorporation of Factor in Chapter Two.—Do not apply this
adjustment if the offense guideline specifically incorporates this factor. The only offense guideline in Chapter Two that specifically incorporates this factor is §2A2.4 (Obstructing or Impeding
Officers).
3. Application of Subsections (a) and (b).—“Motivated by such status”, for purposes of subsections (a) and (b), means that the offense of conviction was motivated by the fact that the victim
was a government officer or employee, a former government officer or employee, or a member of
the immediate family thereof. This adjustment would not apply, for example, where both the
defendant and victim were employed by the same government agency and the offense was motivated by a personal dispute. This adjustment also would not apply in the case of a robbery of a
postal employee because the offense guideline for robbery contains an enhancement
(§2B3.1(b)(1)) that takes such conduct into account.
4. Application of Subsection (c).—
(A) In General.—Subsection (c) applies in circumstances tantamount to aggravated assault
(i) against a law enforcement officer, committed in the course of, or in immediate flight
following, another offense; or (ii) against a prison official, while the defendant (or a person
for whose conduct the defendant is otherwise accountable) was in the custody or control of
a prison or other correctional facility. While subsection (c) may apply in connection with a
variety of offenses that are not by nature targeted against official victims, its applicability
is limited to assaultive conduct against such official victims that is sufficiently serious to
create at least a “substantial risk of serious bodily injury”.
(B) Definitions.—For purposes of subsection (c):
“Custody or control” includes “non-secure custody”, i.e., custody with no significant physical restraint. For example, a defendant is in the custody or control of a prison or other
correctional facility if the defendant (i) is on a work detail outside the security perimeter of
the prison or correctional facility; (ii) is physically away from the prison or correctional
facility while on a pass or furlough; or (iii) is in custody at a community corrections center,
community treatment center, “halfway house”, or similar facility. The defendant also shall
be deemed to be in the custody or control of a prison or other correctional facility while the
defendant is in the status of having escaped from that prison or correctional facility.
“Prison official” means any individual (including a director, officer, employee, independent contractor, or volunteer, but not including an inmate) authorized to act on behalf of a
prison or correctional facility. For example, this enhancement would be applicable to any of
the following: (i) an individual employed by a prison as a corrections officer; (ii) an individual employed by a prison as a work detail supervisor; and (iii) a nurse who, under contract,
provides medical services to prisoners in a prison health facility.
“Substantial risk of serious bodily injury” includes any more serious injury that was
risked, as well as actual serious bodily injury (or more serious injury) if it occurs.
History
Effective November 1, 1987. Amended effective January 15, 1988 (amendment 44); November 1, 1989 (amendments 246, 247, and 248); November 1, 1992 (amendment 455); November 1, 2002 (amendment 643); November 1, 2004 (amendment 663); November 1, 2010 (amendment 747); November 1, 2023 (amend- ment 824); November 1, 2025 (amendment 836).
Provenance
- Source
- ussc.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- ussg-2025
- Content hash
3e1595537bf6433f6d5f0e36f0689950a3fa2c70723e99eabf4f97217868b1d7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.