US · guidelines
U.S.S.G. §2T1.4
Aiding, Assisting, Procuring, Counseling, or Advising Tax Fraud
(a) Base Offense Level:
(1) Level from §2T4.1 (Tax Table) corresponding to the tax loss; or
(2) 6, if there is no tax loss.
For purposes of this guideline, the “tax loss” is the tax loss, as defined in
§2T1.1, resulting from the defendant’s aid, assistance, procurance or advice.
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics
(1) If (A) the defendant committed the offense as part of a pattern or
scheme from which he derived a substantial portion of his income; or
(B) the defendant was in the business of preparing or assisting in the
preparation of tax returns, increase by 2 levels.
(2) If the offense involved sophisticated means, increase by 2 levels. If the
resulting offense level is less than level 12, increase to level 12.
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) (other than a violation based upon 26 U.S.C. § 6050I).
Application Notes:
1. For the general principles underlying the determination of tax loss, see §2T1.1(c) and Application
Note 1 of the Commentary to §2T1.1 (Tax Evasion; Willful Failure to File Return, Supply Information, or Pay Tax; Fraudulent or False Returns, Statements, or Other Documents). In certain
instances, such as promotion of a tax shelter scheme, the defendant may advise other persons to
violate their tax obligations through filing returns that find no support in the tax laws. If this
type of conduct can be shown to have resulted in the filing of false returns (regardless of whether
the principals were aware of their falsity), the misstatements in all such returns will contribute
to one aggregate “tax loss.”
2. Subsection (b)(1) has two prongs. The first prong applies to persons who derive a substantial
portion of their income through the promotion of tax schemes, e.g., through promoting fraudulent
tax shelters. The second prong applies to persons who regularly prepare or assist in the preparation of tax returns for profit. If an enhancement from this subsection applies, do not apply
§3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or Use of Special Skill).
3. Sophisticated Means.—For purposes of subsection (b)(2), “sophisticated means” means especially complex or especially intricate offense conduct pertaining to the execution or concealment of an offense. Conduct such as hiding assets or transactions, or both, through the use of
fictitious entities, corporate shells, or offshore financial accounts ordinarily indicates sophisticated means.
Background: An increased offense level is specified for those in the business of preparing or assisting
in the preparation of tax returns and those who make a business of promoting tax fraud because their
misconduct poses a greater risk of revenue loss and is more clearly willful. Other considerations are
similar to those in §2T1.1.
History
Effective November 1, 1987. Amended effective November 1, 1989 (amendments 231 and 303); November 1, 1990 (amendment 343); November 1, 1993 (amendment 491); November 1, 1998 (amendment 577); Novem- ber 1, 2001 (amendment 617).
Provenance
- Source
- ussc.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- ussg-2018
- Content hash
c311af5f02bb48cd7f1dc11924eea7bff7b9ef45af2e82463d1529fb23c37ae8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.