US · guidelines
U.S.S.G. §2D1.12
Unlawful Possession, Manufacture, Distribution, Transportation, Exportation, or Importation of Prohibited Flask, Equipment, Chemical, Product, or Material; Attempt or Conspiracy
(a) Base Offense Level (Apply the greater):
(1) 12, if the defendant intended to manufacture a controlled substance
or knew or believed the prohibited flask, equipment, chemical, product, or material was to be used to manufacture a controlled substance;
or
(2) 9, if the defendant had reasonable cause to believe the prohibited
flask, equipment, chemical, product, or material was to be used to
manufacture a controlled substance.
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics
(1) If the defendant (A) intended to manufacture methamphetamine, or
(B) knew, believed, or had reasonable cause to believe that prohibited
flask, equipment, chemical, product, or material was to be used to
manufacture methamphetamine, increase by 2 levels.
(2) If the offense involved (A) an unlawful discharge, emission, or release
into the environment of a hazardous or toxic substance; or (B) the unlawful transportation, treatment, storage, or disposal of a hazardous
waste, increase by 2 levels.
(3) If the defendant, or a person for whose conduct the defendant is accountable under §1B1.3 (Relevant Conduct), distributed any prohibited flask, equipment, chemical, product, or material through mass-marketing by means of an interactive computer service, increase by
2 levels.
(4) If the offense involved stealing anhydrous ammonia or transporting
stolen anhydrous ammonia, increase by 6 levels.
(c) Cross Reference
(1) If the offense involved unlawfully manufacturing a controlled substance, or attempting to manufacture a controlled substance unlawfully, apply §2D1.1 (Unlawful Manufacturing, Importing, Exporting,
or Trafficking) if the resulting offense level is greater than that determined above.
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 21 U.S.C. §§ 843(a)(6), (7), 864.
Application Notes:
1. “Offense involved unlawfully manufacturing a controlled substance or attempting to
manufacture a controlled substance unlawfully,” as used in subsection (c)(1), means that
the defendant, or a person for whose conduct the defendant is accountable under §1B1.3 (Relevant Conduct), completed the actions sufficient to constitute the offense of unlawfully manufacturing a controlled substance or attempting to manufacture a controlled substance unlawfully.
2. Subsection (b)(2) applies if the conduct for which the defendant is accountable under §1B1.3 (Relevant Conduct) involved any discharge, emission, release, transportation, treatment, storage, or
disposal violation covered by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d),
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c), the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9603(b), and 49 U.S.C. § 5124 (relating
to violations of laws and regulations enforced by the Department of Transportation with respect
to the transportation of hazardous material). Any costs of environmental cleanup and harm to
persons or property should be considered by the court in determining the amount of restitution
under §5E1.1 (Restitution) and in fashioning appropriate conditions of supervision under
§§5B1.3 (Conditions of Probation) and 5D1.3 (Conditions of Supervised Release).
3. Application of Subsection (b)(3).—For purposes of subsection (b)(3), “mass-marketing by
means of an interactive computer service” means the solicitation, by means of an interactive
computer service, of a large number of persons to induce those persons to purchase a controlled
substance. For example, subsection (b)(3) would apply to a defendant who operated a web site to
promote the sale of prohibited flasks but would not apply to coconspirators who use an interactive
computer service only to communicate with one another in furtherance of the offense. “Interactive computer service”, for purposes of subsection (b)(3) and this note, has the meaning given
that term in section 230(e)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. § 230(f)(2)).
History
Effective November 1, 1991 (amendment 371). Amended effective November 1, 1992 (amendment 447); No- vember 1, 1995 (amendment 520); November 1, 1997 (amendment 558); November 1, 2000 (amend- ment 605); November 1, 2001 (amendment 626); November 1, 2004 (amendment 667); November 1, 2010 (amendment 746); November 1, 2025 (amendment 836).
Provenance
- Source
- ussc.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- ussg-2025
- Content hash
b82b95126d487998baf841d392388073d215c4dc09e8b00221a647006d67b169
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.