US · guidelines
U.S.S.G. §2A3.2
Criminal Sexual Abuse of a Minor Under the Age of Sixteen Years (Statutory Rape) or Attempt to Commit Such Acts
(a) Base Offense Level: 18
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics
(1) If the minor was in the custody, care, or supervisory control of the
defendant, increase by 4 levels.
(2) If (A) subsection (b)(1) does not apply; and (B)(i) the offense involved
the knowing misrepresentation of a participant’s identity to persuade,
induce, entice, or coerce the minor to engage in prohibited sexual conduct; or (ii) a participant otherwise unduly influenced the minor to
engage in prohibited sexual conduct, increase by 4 levels.
(3) If a computer or an interactive computer service was used to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce the minor to engage in prohibited sexual conduct, increase by 2 levels.
(c) Cross Reference
(1) If the offense involved criminal sexual abuse or attempt to commit
criminal sexual abuse (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2241 or § 2242), apply
§2A3.1 (Criminal Sexual Abuse; Attempt to Commit Criminal Sexual
Abuse). If the victim had not attained the age of 12 years, §2A3.1 shall
apply, regardless of the “consent” of the victim.
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a). For additional statutory provision(s), see Appendix A
(Statutory Index).
Application Notes:
1. Definitions.—For purposes of this guideline:
“Computer” has the meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(1).
“Interactive computer service” has the meaning given that term in section 230(e)(2) of the
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. § 230(f)(2)).
“Minor” means (A) an individual who had not attained the age of 16 years; (B) an individual,
whether fictitious or not, who a law enforcement officer represented to a participant (i) had not
attained the age of 16 years, and (ii) could be provided for the purposes of engaging in sexually
explicit conduct; or (C) an undercover law enforcement officer who represented to a participant
that the officer had not attained the age of 16 years.
“Participant” has the meaning given that term in Application Note 1 of §3B1.1 (Aggravating
Role).
“Prohibited sexual conduct” has the meaning given that term in Application Note 1 of §2A3.1
(Criminal Sexual Abuse; Attempt to Commit Criminal Sexual Abuse).
2. Custody, Care, or Supervisory Control Enhancement.—
(A) In General.—Subsection (b)(1) is intended to have broad application and is to be applied
whenever the minor is entrusted to the defendant, whether temporarily or permanently.
For example, teachers, day care providers, baby-sitters, or other temporary caretakers are
among those who would be subject to this enhancement. In determining whether to apply
this enhancement, the court should look to the actual relationship that existed between the
defendant and the minor and not simply to the legal status of the defendant-minor relationship.
(B) Inapplicability of Chapter Three Adjustment.—If the enhancement in subsection (b)(1) applies, do not apply subsection (b)(2) or §3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or
Use of Special Skill).
3. Application of Subsection (b)(2).—
(A) Misrepresentation of Identity.—The enhancement in subsection (b)(2)(B)(i) applies in
cases involving the misrepresentation of a participant’s identity to persuade, induce, entice,
or coerce the minor to engage in prohibited sexual conduct. Subsection (b)(2)(B)(i) is intended to apply only to misrepresentations made directly to the minor or to a person who
exercises custody, care, or supervisory control of the minor. Accordingly, the enhancement
in subsection (b)(2)(B)(i) would not apply to a misrepresentation made by a participant to
an airline representative in the course of making travel arrangements for the minor.
The misrepresentation to which the enhancement in subsection (b)(2)(B)(i) may apply includes misrepresentation of a participant’s name, age, occupation, gender, or status, as long
as the misrepresentation was made with the intent to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce
the minor to engage in prohibited sexual conduct. Accordingly, use of a computer screen
name, without such intent, would not be a sufficient basis for application of the enhancement.
(B) Undue Influence.—In determining whether subsection (b)(2)(B)(ii) applies, the court
should closely consider the facts of the case to determine whether a participant’s influence
over the minor compromised the voluntariness of the minor’s behavior. The voluntariness
of the minor’s behavior may be compromised without prohibited sexual conduct occurring.
However, subsection (b)(2)(B)(ii) does not apply in a case in which the only “minor” (as defined in Application Note 1) involved in the offense is an undercover law enforcement officer.
In a case in which a participant is at least 10 years older than the minor, there shall be a
rebuttable presumption that subsection (b)(2)(B)(ii) applies. In such a case, some degree of
undue influence can be presumed because of the substantial difference in age between the
participant and the minor.
4. Application of Subsection (b)(3).—Subsection (b)(3) provides an enhancement if a computer
or an interactive computer service was used to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce the minor to
engage in prohibited sexual conduct. Subsection (b)(3) is intended to apply only to the use of a
computer or an interactive computer service to communicate directly with the minor or with a
person who exercises custody, care, or supervisory control of the minor.
5. Cross Reference.—Subsection (c)(1) provides a cross reference to §2A3.1 (Criminal Sexual
Abuse; Attempt to Commit Criminal Sexual Abuse) if the offense involved criminal sexual abuse
or attempt to commit criminal sexual abuse, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2241 or § 2242. For example, the cross reference to §2A3.1 shall apply if (A) the victim had not attained the age of 12 years
(see 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c)); (B) the victim had attained the age of 12 years but not attained the age
of 16 years, and was placed in fear of death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping (see 18 U.S.C.
§ 2241(a),(c)); or (C) the victim was threatened or placed in fear other than fear of death, serious
bodily injury, or kidnapping (see 18 U.S.C. § 2242(1)).
Background: This section applies to offenses involving the criminal sexual abuse of an individual
who had not attained the age of 16 years. While this section applies to consensual sexual acts prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a) that would be lawful but for the age of the minor, it also applies to
cases, prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a), in which a participant took active measure(s) to unduly
influence the minor to engage in prohibited sexual conduct and, thus, the voluntariness of the minor’s
behavior was compromised. A four-level enhancement is provided in subsection (b)(2) for such cases.
It is assumed that at least a four-year age difference exists between the minor and the defendant, as
specified in 18 U.S.C. § 2243(a). A four-level enhancement is provided in subsection (b)(1) for a defendant who victimizes a minor under his supervision or care. However, if the minor had not attained the
age of 12 years, §2A3.1 (Criminal Sexual Abuse; Attempt to Commit Criminal Sexual Abuse) will apply, regardless of the “consent” of the minor.
History
Effective November 1, 1987. Amended effective November 1, 1989 (amendment 93); November 1, 1991 (amendment 392); November 1, 1992 (amendment 444); November 1, 1995 (amendment 511); November 1, 2000 (amendment 592); November 1, 2001 (amendment 615); November 1, 2004 (amendment 664); Novem- ber 1, 2009 (amendment 732); November 1, 2010 (amendment 746); November 1, 2025 (amendment 836).
Provenance
- Source
- ussc.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-20
- Edition
- ussg-2025
- Content hash
239a43eae48d8c385ae4e2dcda85d778ab5ac153e4ad646a94c2f2afefcbe97d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.