US · guidance
CMS SOM Ch. 5 § 5590
Accredited Laboratory Found Not in Condition-level Compliance Following a
Complaint Survey
5000.1 – Purpose of the Complaint/Incident Process
Mission: To protect Medicare/Medicaid beneficiaries from abuse, neglect, exploitation,
inadequate care or supervision.
The goal of the Federal complaint/incident process is to establish a system that will assist
in promoting and protecting the health, safety, and welfare of residents, patients, and
clients receiving health care services. The complaint/incident management system has
three objectives.
1. The first objective and priority for the complaint/incident management system is
protective oversight. This is accomplished by analyzing the complaint allegations
and reported incidents received to identify and respond to those that appear to
pose the greatest potential for harming beneficiaries (has caused or is likely to
cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death). Complaints/incidents of this
type that allege an immediate threat to the health, safety or welfare of individuals
are investigated immediately.
2. The second objective is prevention. Complaints/incidents that do not allege a
threat of serious harm are investigated to determine if a problem exists that could
have a negative impact on the healthcare services provided. The investigation of
these complaints/incidents is designed to identify and correct less serious
complaints/incident to prevent the escalation of these problems into more serious
situations that would threaten the health, safety and welfare of the individuals
receiving the service. These complaints/incidents are also prioritized and
investigated based on the seriousness of the allegations.
Numerous or more frequent complaints/incidents may indicate systemic problems
and therefore may be assigned a higher priority for investigation.
3. The third objective is to promote efficiency and quality within the health care
delivery system. Complaints/incidents that are not directly related to Federal
requirements are forwarded to the appropriate agency(ies) for follow-up and
investigation. Complaints/incidents in this category may include but are not
limited to Medicare/Medicaid fraud, complaints against individual licensed
practitioners, and billing issues.
5000.2 – Overview
(Rev. 243; Issued: 06-12-26; Effective: 06-12-26; Implementation: 06-12-26)
All the procedures in this chapter are followed when complaints and reported incidents,
including referrals from public entities, involve Medicare-certified providers/suppliers,
Medicaid-certified providers/suppliers, or CLIA-certified laboratories. The investigation
and resolution of complaints are critical certification activities. The CMS, the State
Medicaid Agency (SMA), and the State survey agency (SA) are responsible for ensuring
that participating providers/suppliers of health care services continually meet Federal
requirements. This requires that the SA promptly reviews complaints/incidents, conducts
unannounced onsite investigations of reports alleging noncompliance, and informs the
CMS location and/or the SMA any time certification requirements are found to be out of
compliance.
Since there are multiple activities associated with the management of complaints and
incidents, responsibilities often cut across organizational lines. Thus, the SA must
demonstrate clear-cut accountability for each step of the process and a focal
coordinating/controlling responsibility to assure timely and appropriate action. The SA’s
responsibilities cannot be delegated.
History
Rev. 212; Issued; 02-10-23; Effective: 10-21-22; Implementation: 10-24-22
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
838ace47e5daa0ec7b2801c4e8015554bd987fc21c3d9ca6d13e920b2ffbdf2c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.