US · guidance
CMS SOM App. Z, Tag E-0029
§403.748(c), §416.54(c), §418.113(c), §441.184(c), §460.84(c), §482.15(c), §483.73(c),
§483.475(c), §484.102(c), §485.68(c), §485.625(c), §485.727(c), §485.920(c),
§486.360(c), §491.12(c), §494.62(c).
(c) The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness
communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be
reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities].
Interpretive Guidelines applies to: §403.748(c), §416.54(c), §418.113(c), §441.184(c),
§460.84(c), §482.15(c), §483.73(c), §483.475(c), §484.102(c), §485.68(c), §485.625(c),
§485.727(c), §485.920(c), §486.360(c), §491.12(c), §494.62(c).
NOTE: This does not apply to Transplant Programs.
Facilities must have a written emergency communication plan that contains how the
facility coordinates patient care within the facility, across healthcare providers, and with
state and local public health departments. The communication plan should include how
the facility interacts and coordinates with emergency management agencies and systems
to protect patient health and safety in the event of a disaster. The development of a
communication plan will support the coordination of care. The plan must be reviewed
annually and updated as necessary. We are allowing facilities flexibility in how they
formulate and operationalize the requirements of the communication plan. Although the
requirement for documentation of collaboration with state and local officials was
removed (see 84 FR 51817, Sept. 30, 2019), facilities should still continue to collaborate
with state and local emergency officials. During the creation process for communication
plans, facilities should also consult their applicable state and local emergency and
pandemic plans.
Facilities in rural or remote areas with limited connectivity to communication
methodologies such as the Internet, World Wide Web, or cellular capabilities need to
ensure their communication plan addresses how they would communicate and comply
with this requirement in the absence of these communication methodologies. For
example, if a facility is located in a rural area, which has limited or no Internet and phone
connectivity during an emergency, it should address what alternate means are available to
alert local and State emergency officials. Optional communication methods facilities
may consider include satellite phones, radios and short wave radios.
Survey Procedures
• Verify that the facility has a written communication plan by asking to see the
plan.
• Ask to see evidence that the plan has been reviewed (and updated as necessary) at
least every 2 years (annually for LTC facilities).
• Ask facility leadership or the designee responsible for the emergency program to
verbally explain how they are to collaborate with Federal, State and local
officials to ensure their communication plan complies with the Federal, State and
local requirements.
History
Rev. 204, Issued: 04-16-21; Effective: 04-16-21, Implementation: 04-16-21
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
09f113b609ce7a7e6d61dfd50544ceb1156d0924d7165eaee36a6d837a3d529d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.