US · guidance
CMS SOM App. X, Tag X-123
§482.98(d)(2) The independent living donor advocate or independent living donor advocate
team must demonstrate:
(i) Knowledge of living organ donation, transplantation, medical ethics, and informed
consent; and
(ii) Understanding of the potential impact of family and other external pressures on the
prospective living donor’s decision whether to donate and the ability to discuss these issues
with the donor.
Guideline §482.98(d)(2)
The ILDA must be able to provide evidence of successful training which addressed the topics
listed in the standard.
Interviews with living donors confirm that the ILDA provided information concerning:
• The organ donation process;
• The requirements of the informed consent process;
• The immediate and long-term expectations following donation;
• The immediate and long-term risks of donation;
• The expected outcomes for the recipient;
• The potential financial responsibilities related to donation; and
• Any alternative treatment(s) for the potential transplant recipient, if available.
The living donor medical record should fully chronical the interactions between the advocate or
advocate team and donor candidate including the assessed level of understanding by the donor
candidate during interactions.
The CoPs do not specify requirements for a donor advocate’s background, education, or training
or the donor advocate team’s composition. Instead, it specifies their duties and the skills they
must be able to demonstrate in 482.98(d)(2) (Tag X-123) and 482.98(d)(3) (Tag X-124).
History
Rev. 227; Issued: 12-13-24; Effective: 12-13-24; Implementation: 12-13-24
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
843d480bf2c0de499a8d889b91a47c78643522aecddc22a031835c8c78df1cc3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.