US · guidance
CMS SOM App. X, Tag X-103
§482.96(b)(2) The transplant program must conduct a thorough analysis of and document
any adverse event… .
Guideline §482.96(b)(2)
A thorough analysis is a planned, systematic investigative process that considers all of the phases
of transplantation/living donation in identifying the causes of and factors contributing to an
adverse event. The scope and depth of analysis, as well as the extent of multi-disciplinary
involvement, may be scaled in proportion to the scope and severity of the harm experienced
and/or the risk of harm involved.
A thorough analysis would include, but is not limited to:
• A description of the key facts of the event in enough detail so that one can clearly
understand the facts and chronology of what occurred, the severity of the event, and how
the potential recipient or potential living donor was affected;
• A review of whether similar events have occurred in the past;
• All of the information needed to identify factors that may have caused or contributed to
the outcome, directly or indirectly;
• Analysis of the information to identify actual and potential vulnerabilities and
opportunities to reduce risks and improve care;
• Use of the results of the analysis to design improvement actions to address the factors
that caused or contributed to the event’s occurrence, including factors and processes; and
• Specific plan for implementing, evaluating and monitoring improvement actions
(timeframes, responsible parties, measurement strategy to assess effectiveness, etc.).
History
Rev. 200, Issued: 02-21-20; Effective: 02-21-20, Implementation: 02-21-20
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
64b1f57fcb281771b159178aa9f325b18c74f80d8d554745c4cb766d0120c3f7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.