US · guidance
CMS SOM App. W, Tag C-0986
§485.631(b)(1)
[The doctor of medicine or osteopathy-]
(iv) Periodically reviews and signs the records of all inpatients cared for by nurse
practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or physician assistants.
(v) Periodically reviews and signs a sample of outpatient records of patients cared
for by nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse midwives, or
physician assistants only to the extent required under State law where State law
requires record reviews or co-signatures, or both, by a collaborating physician.
Interpretive Guidelines §485.631(b)(1)(iv) & (v)
All inpatient records for patients whose treatment is/was managed by a nonphysician
practitioner in the CAH, i.e., nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or physician
assistants, must be reviewed periodically by a CAH MD/DO who must sign the records
after the review has been completed. The MD/DO review is expected to cover all
applicable inpatient records open at the time of the review, as well as all applicable
inpatient records closed since the last review.
In the case of inpatients whose care is/was managed by an MD/DO, as evidenced by an
admission order, progress notes, and/or medical orders, etc., but who also receive
services from a non-physician practitioner, a subsequent MD/DO review of the inpatient
record is not required.
In States where State law requires a collaborating physician to review medical records,
co-sign medical records, or both for outpatients whose care is managed by a non-physician practitioner, i.e., a nurse practitioner, a clinical nurse specialist, a certified
nurse midwife, or a physician assistant, a CAH MD/DO must review and sign a sample
of outpatient records. The outpatient medical record sample reviewed must be
representative of all non-physician practitioners providing care to patients of the CAH.
The CAH determines by policy the size of the sample reviewed and signed; however,
CMS recommends, but does not require, a sample size of 25% of the records of all
outpatient encounters managed by a non-physician practitioner since the prior MD/DO
review. If State law requires MD/DO review or signature of a larger percentage of the
outpatient records, the CAH must comply with State law.
In States where no physician record review or physician co-signature is required for
patients managed by a non-physician practitioner, an MD/DO is not required to review or
sign outpatient records of such patients.
Neither the regulation nor the preamble to the final rule adopting this regulation (79 Fed.
Reg. 27105, May 12, 2014) specify a particular timeframe to satisfy the requirement for
“periodic” review, but the CAH must specify a maximum interval between inpatient
record reviews in its policies and procedures. The CAH is expected to take into account
the volume and types of services it offers in developing its policy. For example, a CAH
that has only four certified beds and one MD/DO on staff and which does not always
have an inpatient in house would likely establish a different requirement for inpatient
record review than a CAH with 25 certified beds, multiple MDs/DOs on staff and a high
inpatient occupancy rate. Further, there is no regulatory requirement for the review of
records to be performed on site and in person. Thus, if the CAH has electronic medical
records that can be accessed and digitally signed remotely by the MD or DO, this method
of review is acceptable. Therefore, CAHs with and without the capability for electronic
record review and signature might also develop different policies for the maximum
interval between reviews.
Survey Procedures §485.631(b)(1)(iv) & (v)
Select a sample of inpatient and outpatient records, including both open and closed
records.
• For inpatient records of patients whose care is/was managed by a non-physician
practitioner, verify that:
• An MD/DO has reviewed and signed all records that were open at the time of the
review, and all inpatient records that were closed since the MD/DO’s last review;
and
• That reviews take place within the timeframe specified by the CAH’s policy.
• If State law requires a physician to review or co-sign (or both) any outpatient
records of patients whose care is/was managed by non-physician practitioner,
determine whether an MD or DO has reviewed and/or co-signed a representative
sample of these records within the timeframe specified in the CAH’s policies.
• Ask the CAH how many outpatient encounters are managed by non-physician
practitioners, what sample size its policy requires to have an MD/DO review, and
what timeframe its policy specifies for reviews.
• Ask the CAH to explain how it ensures the sample is representative of the various
non-physician practitioners as well as of the various types of outpatient services
they provide.
• Ask the CAH to describe the method it uses to make sure that reviews are
performed in a timely manner on a sample that complies with the CAH’s policy.
• Review selected records from the CAH’s outpatient sample to verify that there is
evidence of an MD or DO review and/or signature.
History
Rev. 200, Issued: 02-21-20; Effective: 02-21-20, Implementation: 02-21-20
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
eda0b36ddde1e2ad2b2f8f25f25a828b1addb3cea7e8156c0cdc779585586864
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.