US · guidance
CMS SOM App. W, Tag C-0812
§485.608(a) Standard: Compliance with Federal Laws and Regulations
The CAH is in compliance with applicable Federal laws and regulations related to
the health and safety of patients.
Interpretive Guidelines §485.608(a)
Each CAH must be in compliance with applicable Federal laws and regulations related to
the health and safety of patients. This includes other Medicare regulations and Federal
laws and regulations not specifically addressed in the CoPs. State Survey Agencies are
expected to assess the CAH’s compliance with the following Medicare provider
agreement regulation provisions when surveying for compliance with §485.608(a):
Advance Directives
An advance directive is defined at 42 CFR 489.100 as “a written instruction, such as a
living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law
(whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State), relating to the provision of
health care when the individual is incapacitated.” In accordance with the provisions of
42 CFR 489.102(a), the advance directives regulations apply to CAHs. The CAH patient
(inpatient or outpatient) has the right to formulate advance directives, and to have CAH
staff implement and comply with the individual’s advance directive. The regulation at 42
CFR 489.102 specifies the rights of a patient (as permitted by State law) to make medical
care decisions, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and
the right to formulate, at the individual’s option, advance directives.
In the advance directive, the patient may provide guidance as to his/her wishes
concerning provision of care in certain situations; alternatively, the patient may delegate
decision-making authority to another individual, as permitted by State law. (In addition,
the patient may use the advance directive to designate a “support person,” as specified in
§485.635(f), for purposes of exercising the patient’s visitation rights.) When a patient
who is incapacitated has executed an advance directive designating a particular individual
to make medical decisions for him/her when incapacitated, the CAH must, when
presented with the document, provide the designated individual the information required
to make informed decisions about the patient’s care. The CAH must also seek the
consent of the patient’s representative when informed consent is required for a care
decision. The explicit designation of a representative in the patient’s advance directive
takes precedence over any non-designated relationship and continues throughout the
patient’s inpatient stay or, as applicable, outpatient visit, unless the patient ceases to be
incapacitated and expressly withdraws the designation, either orally or in writing.
§489.102 also requires the CAH to:
• Provide written notice of its policies regarding the implementation of patients’
rights to make decisions concerning medical care, such as the right to formulate
advance directives. If an individual is incapacitated or otherwise unable to
communicate, the CAH may provide the advance directive information required
under §489.100 to the individual’s “family or surrogate in the same manner that it
issues other materials about policies and procedures to the family of the
incapacitated individual or to a surrogate or other concerned persons in accordance
with State law.” (§489.102(e)) §489.102(b)(1) requires that notice of the CAH’s
advance directive policy be provided at the time an individual is admitted as an
inpatient. However, the CAH should also consider providing the advance directive
notice at the time of registration, to outpatients (or their representatives) who are in
the emergency department, who are in an observation status, or who are undergoing
same-day surgery.
• The notice must include a clear and precise statement of limitation if the CAH
cannot implement an advance directive on the basis of conscience. At a minimum, a
statement of limitation should:
• Clarify any differences between institution-wide conscience objections and
those that may be raised by individual physicians or other practitioners;
• Identify the State legal authority permitting such an objection; and
• Describe the range of medical conditions or procedures affected by the
conscience objection.
It should be noted that this provision allowing for certain conscience objections
to implementing an advance directive is narrowly focused on the directive’s
content related to medical conditions or procedures. This provision would not
allow a CAH or individual physician or practitioner to refuse to honor those
portions of an advance directive that designate an individual as the patient’s
representative and/or support person, given that such designation does not
concern a medical condition or procedure.
Issuance of the written notice of the CAH’s advance directive policies to the
patient or the patient’s representative must be documented in the patient’s
medical record.
• Document in a prominent part of the patient’s medical record whether or not the
patient has executed an advance directive;
• Not condition the provision of care or otherwise discriminate against an
individual based on whether or not the individual has executed an advance
directive;
• Assure compliance with requirements of State law concerning advance directives
and inform individuals that complaints concerning the advance directive
requirements may be filed with the State survey and certification agency;
• Provide for the education of staff concerning its policies and procedures on
advance directives. The right to formulate advance directives includes the right to
formulate a psychiatric advance directive (as allowed by State law); and
• Provide community education regarding advance directives and the CAH must
document its efforts.
A psychiatric advance directive is akin to a traditional advance directive for health care.
This type of advance directive might be prepared by an individual who is concerned that
at some time he or she may be subject to involuntary psychiatric commitment or
treatment. The psychiatric advance directive may cover a range of subjects, and may
name another person who is authorized to make decisions for the individual if he or she is
determined to be legally incompetent to make his/her own choices. It may also provide
the patient’s instructions about hospitalization, alternatives to hospitalization, the use of
medications, types of therapies, and the patient’s wishes concerning restraint or seclusion.
The patient may designate who should be notified upon his/her admission to the CAH, as
well as who should not be permitted to visit him or her. State laws regarding the use of
psychiatric advance directives vary.
In accordance with State law, a psychiatric advance directive should be accorded the
same respect and consideration that a traditional advance directive for health care is
given. CAHs should carefully coordinate how the choices of a patient balance with the
rights of other patients, staff, and individuals in the event that a dangerous situation
arises.
However, even if State law has not explicitly spoken to the use of psychiatric advance
directives, consideration should be given to them. When the patient is, for whatever
reason, unable to communicate his/her wishes, the preferences expressed in the
psychiatric advance directive can give critical insight to the CAH’s professional staff as
they develop a plan of care and treatment for the patient.
Required CAH Disclosures to Patients:
Physician Ownership
• 42 CFR 489.3 defines a “physician-owned hospital” as any participating hospital,
including a CAH, in which a physician or immediate family member of a physician
(as defined in §411.351) has an ownership or investment interest in the CAH, except
for those satisfying an exception found at §411.356(a) or (b). Surveyors are not
required to make an independent determination regarding whether a CAH meets the
Medicare definition of “physician-owned,” but they must ask whether the CAH is
physician-owned.
• However, the notice requirement does not apply to any physician-owned CAH that
does not have at least one referring physician (as defined at §411.351 of this chapter)
who has an ownership or investment interest in the CAH or who has an immediate
family member who has an ownership or investment interest in the CAH. In such
cases, the CAH must sign an attestation statement that it has no referring physician
with an ownership or investment interest or whose immediate family member has an
ownership or investment interest in the CAH. The CAH must maintain this
attestation in its records.
• 42 CFR 489.20(u)(1) requires that all physician-owned CAHs provide written notice
to their patients at the beginning of each patient’s CAH inpatient stay or outpatient
visit stating that the CAH is physician-owned, in order to assist the patient in making
an informed decision about his or her care.
• A planned inpatient stay or outpatient visit which is subject to the notice
requirement begins with the provision of a package of information regarding
scheduled preadmission testing and registration for a planned CAH admission for
inpatient care or for an outpatient service subject to notice. An unplanned
inpatient stay or outpatient visit subject to the notice requirement begins at the
earliest point at which the patient presents to the CAH.
• The notice must disclose, in a manner reasonably designed to be understood by all
patients, that the CAH is physician-owned and that a list of owners or investors who
are physicians or immediate family members of physicians is available upon request.
If the patient (or someone on behalf of the patient) requests this list, the CAH must
provide it at the time of the request.
• 42 CFR 489.20(u)(2) provides that physician-owned CAHs must require each
physician owner who is a member of the hospital’s medical staff to agree, as a
condition of obtaining/retaining CAH medical staff membership or admitting
privileges, to disclose in writing to all patients they refer to the CAH their ownership
or investment interest or that of any immediate family member in the CAH. The
CAH must require that this disclosure be made at the time of the referral and the
requirement should be reflected in the hospital’s policies and procedures governing
privileges for physician owners.
• The CAH may exempt from this disclosure requirement any physician owner who
does not refer any patients to the CAH.
• 42 CFR 489.12 permits CMS to refuse to enter into a provider agreement with a
physician-owned CAH applicant that does not have procedures in place to notify
patients of physician ownership in the hospital, as required under §483.20(u).
• 42 CFR 489.53(c) permits CMS to terminate the provider agreement of a physician-owned CAH if the CAH fails to comply with the requirements at §489.20(u).
MD/DO 24/7 On-Site Presence
42 CFR 489.20(w) mandates that if there is no doctor of medicine or osteopathy present
in the CAH 24 hours per day, seven days per week the CAH must provide written notice
to all inpatients at the beginning of a planned or unplanned inpatient stay, and to
outpatients for certain types of outpatient visits. The purpose of the requirement is to
assist the patient in making an informed decision about his/her care. CAHs that have an
MD/DO (including residents who are MDs or DOs) on-site 24/7 do not need to issue any
disclosure notice about emergency services capability.
• The notice must be provided to all inpatients and to those outpatients who are under
observation or who are having surgery or any other procedure using anesthesia.
• The notice must be provided at the beginning of the planned or unplanned inpatient
stay, or applicable outpatient visit.
• A planned inpatient stay or outpatient visit which is subject to the notice requirement
begins with the provision of a package of information regarding scheduled
preadmission testing and registration for a planned CAH admission for inpatient care
or for an outpatient service subject to notice. An unplanned inpatient stay or
outpatient visit subject to the notice requirement begins at the earliest point at which
the patient presents to the CAH.
• Individual notices are not required in the CAH’s dedicated emergency department
(DED) (as that term is defined in 42 CFR 489.24(b)), but the DED must post a notice
conspicuously, in a place or places likely to be noticed by all individuals entering the
dedicated emergency department. The posted notice must state that the CAH does
not have a doctor of medicine or a doctor of osteopathy present in the hospital 24
hours per day, 7 days per week, and must indicate how the CAH will meet the
medical needs of any patient with an emergency medical condition, as defined in 42
CFR 489.24(b) [the EMTALA definition], at a time when there is no doctor of
medicine or doctor of osteopathy present in the CAH. If an emergency department
patient is determined to require admission, then the individual notice provisions of 42
CFR 489.20(w) would apply to that patient.
• Before admitting an inpatient or providing outpatient services requiring notice, the
CAH must obtain a signed acknowledgement from the patient stating that he/she
understands that a doctor of medicine or doctor of osteopathy may not be present
during all hours services are furnished to him/her.
• In the event of an unplanned surgery or inpatient admission to treat an emergency
medical condition, it may in some cases be necessary in the interest of the
patient’s safety to proceed with treatment before the required notice can be given
and acknowledgement can be obtained. In such circumstances the CAH must
provide notice and obtain acknowledgement as soon as possible after the patient’s
stay or visit begins.
• For a CAH that participates in Medicare with multiple campuses providing inpatient
services (e.g., a main provider campus and a separate remote location for a
psychiatric or rehabilitation distinct part unit (DPU)) under one CMS Certification
Number) a separate determination is made for each campus/location with inpatient
services as to whether the disclosure notice is required. For example, if a CAH has a
main campus with 25 inpatient beds and a remote location with 10 psychiatric DPU
beds and 10 rehabilitation DPU beds, and a physician is present 24/7 on the main
campus, but not at the DPU remote location, the CAH is required to provide the
disclosure notice at the DPU location. No notice is required for patients coming to
the main provider campus. In this same example, if the CAH also has a provider-based, off-campus ambulatory surgery department, no notice is required at that off-campus surgery site, since the CAH’s main campus does have an MD/DO present
24/7.
• 42 CFR 489.53(c) permits CMS to terminate a provider agreement with a CAH if the
CAH fails to comply with the requirements at §489.20(w) when it does not have an
MD or DO on-site 24/ 7.
Other Federal Requirements
Other Federal requirements also apply to patient health and safety in the CAH. For
example, Federal laws and regulations govern both the disposal of medical waste and
occupational health. However, surveyors are not expected to be knowledgeable about the
requirements of other Federal agencies and therefore do not assess compliance with non-CMS regulations. A surveyor who suspects a CAH may not be in compliance with other
Federal requirements may refer the matter to the appropriate Federal agency. If CMS is
notified or becomes aware of another Federal agency’s final enforcement action, action
will be taken only if the final enforcement action remains in effect.
Survey Procedures §485.608(a)
Assessing Compliance with Advance Directives Requirements
• Review the CAH’s advance directive notice. Does it advise inpatients or applicable
outpatients, or their representatives, of the patient’s right to formulate an advance
directive and to have CAH staff comply with the advance directive (in accordance
with State law)? Does it include a clear, precise, and valid statement of limitation if
the CAH cannot implement an advance directive on the basis of conscience?
• Review the records of a sample of patients for evidence of CAH compliance with
advance directive notice requirements. Does every inpatient or applicable outpatient
record contain documentation that notice of the CAH’s advance directives policy
was provided at the time of admission or registration? Is there documentation of
whether or not each patient has an advance directive? For those patients who have
reported an advance directive, has a copy of the patient’s advance directive been
placed in the medical record?
• What mechanism does the CAH have in place to allow patients to formulate an
advance directive or to update their current advance directive? Is there evidence that
the CAH is promoting and protecting each patient’s right to formulate an advance
directive?
• Determine to what extent the CAH complies, as permitted under State law, with
patient advance directives that delegate decisions about the patient’s care to a
designated individual.
• Determine to what extent the CAH educates its staff regarding advance directives.
• Interview staff to determine their knowledge of the advance directives of the patients
in their care.
• Determine to what extent the CAH provides education for the patient population
regarding one’s rights under State law to formulate advance directives.
Assessing Required Disclosures
Physician Ownership
• If the CAH indicates that it is physician-owned but is exempt under §489.20(v)
from the disclosure requirement of §489.20(u)(2), ask to see the signed attestation
that it does not have any referring physicians with an ownership/investment interest
or whose immediate family member was has an ownership/investment interest in
the CAH. (As with any other on-the-spot correction of a deficiency during a
survey, creation of an attestation at the time of a survey does not mean that there
was no deficiency and that the CAH would not be cited.)
• If the CAH is physician-owned but not exempt from the physician ownership
disclosure requirements:
• Verify that appropriate policies and procedures are in place to assure that
written notices are provided to all patients at the beginning of an inpatient or
outpatient stay.
• Review the notice the CAH issues to each patient to verify that it discloses, in a
manner reasonably designed to be understood by all patients, that the CAH
meets the Federal definition of “physician-owned,” that a list of owners and
investors who are physicians or immediate family members of physicians is
available upon request, and that such list is provided to the patient at the time
the request is made by or on behalf of the patient.
• Determine through staff interviews, observation, and a review of policies and
procedures whether the CAH furnishes its list of physician owners and
investors at the time a patient or patient’s representative requests it.
• Determine through staff interviews and review of policies, procedures, and
staff records whether a physician-owned CAH’s medical staff membership and
admitting privileging requirements include a requirement that, as a condition of
continued membership or admitting privileges, physician owners who refer
patients to the CAH agree to provide written disclosure of their own or any
immediate family member’s ownership or investment interest to all patients at
time of the referral to the CAH.
MD/DO 24/7 On-site Presence
• Determine through interviews, observation, and medical record review whether an
MD/DO is present in the CAH 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. For each required
location where an MD/DO is not present:
• Verify that appropriate policies and procedures are in place to assure that written
notices that a MD/DO is not present at all times are provided at the beginning of
a planned or unplanned inpatient stay or outpatient visit to all inpatients and to
all outpatients receiving observation services, surgery or another procedure
requiring anesthesia.
• Verify that there is a signed acknowledgement by the patient of such disclosure,
obtained by the CAH prior to the patient’s admission or before applicable
outpatient services were provided.
• Ask a sample of inpatients and affected outpatients whether they were provided
notice about an MD/DO not being present at all times in the CAH.
• Verify that the CAH’s emergency department has signage with the appropriate
disclosure information.
• Review the notice the CAH issues to verify that it indicates how the CAH will
meet the medical needs of any patient who develops an emergency medical
condition at a time when no physician is present at that CAH, including any
remote location.
Other Federal Requirements
Surveyors do not assess compliance with Medicare payment provisions or non-Medicare
requirements. However, a surveyor may refer suspected noncompliance with Federal
laws and regulations to the appropriate agency having jurisdiction (e.g., hazardous
chemical and waste issues to EPA, blood-borne pathogens and TB control to OSHA,
etc.).
History
Rev. 200, Issued: 02-21-20; Effective: 02-21-20, Implementation: 02-21-20
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
b5b0e7af69c23db4f34c45b3609d0946af4512ebacd899d5b3fbf0f49567cf47
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.