US · guidance
CMS SOM App. W, Tag C-0340
§485.641(b)(4) The quality and appropriateness of the diagnosis and treatment
furnished by doctors of medicine or osteopathy at the CAH are evaluated by--
(i) One hospital that is a member of the network, when applicable;
(ii) One QIO or equivalent entity;
(iii) One other appropriate and qualified entity identified in the State rural
health care plan;
(iv) In the case of distant-site physicians and practitioners providing
telemedicine services to the CAH’s patients under a written agreement between the
CAH and a distant-site hospital, the distant-site hospital; or
(v) In the case of distant-site physicians and practitioners providing
telemedicine services to the CAH’s patients under a written agreement between the
CAH and a distant-site telemedicine entity, one of the entities listed in paragraphs
(b)(4)(i) through (iii)of this section;
Interpretive Guidelines §485.641(b)(4)
All CAHs must, as a part of their quality assurance program, have an arrangement with
an outside entity to review the appropriateness of the diagnosis and treatment provided by
each MD/DO providing services to the CAH’s patients. This includes MDs and DOs
providing telemedicine services to the CAH’s patients from a distant-site hospital or
distant-site telemedicine entity. (See §485.616(c) for more information about
requirements for telemedicine services.
Some CAHs may prefer to conduct their own internal review in addition to the outside
review; this is neither prohibited nor required under the regulation. The regulation does
not specify the frequency of the outside review, since a quality assurance program is
ongoing in nature. The CAH and the outside entity must reach a mutual agreement on
the extent and frequency of the outside review.
Entities eligible to provide this outside review include, for MDs and DOs who provide
services on-site at the CAH, a hospital that is a member of the same rural health network
as the CAH; a Medicare Quality Improvement Organization, or its equivalent; or another
appropriate and qualified entity identified in the State’s Rural Health Plan to perform this
function.
In the case of MDs or DOs who provide telemedicine services to the CAH’s patients
under a written agreement between the CAH and a distant-site hospital, the distant-site
hospital is the outside entity responsible for reviewing the quality of care provided by
these physicians.
In the case of MDs or DOs who provide telemedicine services to the CAH’s patients
under a written agreement between the CAH and a distant-site telemedicine entity, the
outside entity responsible for reviewing the quality of care provided by these physicians
include a hospital that is a member of the same rural health network as the CAH; a
Medicare Quality Improvement Organization, or its equivalent; another appropriate and
qualified entity identified in the State’s Rural Health Plan to perform this function; or a
distant-site hospital with which the CAH has an agreement for provision of telemedicine
services.
Survey Procedures §485.641 (b)(4)
• Is there evidence that the CAH has an agreement for outside review of the quality
of care provided on-site (i.e., not including telemedicine services) by the CAH’s
MDs and DOs with at least one of the following: a hospital that is a member of
the same rural health network as the CAH; a Medicare Quality Improvement
Organization, or its equivalent; or another appropriate and qualified entity
identified in the State’s Rural Health Plan?
• If the CAH has one or more agreements for the provision of telemedicine services
to CAH patients by a distant-site hospital(s), does each such agreement include a
provision for the distant-site hospital to conduct the required outside review of the
quality of telemedicine services provided by the MDs and DOs covered by the
agreement?
• If the CAH has one or more agreements for the provision of telemedicine services
to CAH patients by a distant-site telemedicine entity, does the CAH have an
agreement for outside review of the quality of telemedicine services provided by
the MDs and DOs covered under the agreement? Is the outside review agreement
with at least one of the following: a hospital that is a member of the same rural
health network as the CAH; a Medicare Quality Improvement Organization, or its
equivalent; another appropriate and qualified entity identified in the State’s Rural
Health Plan; or a distant-site hospital with which the CAH has an agreement for
telemedicine services?
• Can the CAH provide examples of any reviews of the quality and appropriateness
of diagnosis and treatment of the CAHs MDs and DOs conducted by an eligible
outside entity in the prior 12 – 24 months?
History
Rev. 78, Issued: 12-22-11, Effective/Implementation: 12-22-11
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
d2905ab4f4629ce872d371e47c4f94004a7e19657e843085741be382f96545af
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.