US · guidance
CMS SOM App. PP, Tag F713
§483.30(d) Availability of physicians for emergency care
The facility must provide or arrange for the provision of physician services 24 hours
a day, in case of emergency.
GUIDANCE §483.30(d)
If a resident’s attending physician is unavailable, the facility should attempt to contact the
physician covering for the attending physician before assuming the responsibility of
contacting another physician.
Arranging for physician services may include assuring resident transportation to a
hospital emergency room or other medical facility if the facility is unable to meet the
particular medical need at the facility. The provision of transportation does not remove
the facility’s responsibility to have a physician available, 24 hours a day, to respond to
emergencies that do not require medical care in an alternative setting.
PROBES §483.30(d)
• Does the facility have a physician on-call for medical emergencies? Does this
physician respond?
• In emergency situations, are residents unnecessarily sent to hospital emergency
rooms due to the lack of physician availability or inability to contact a physician?
Consider whether the resident’s needs could have been met in the facility had the
facility had a physician available.
• If the facility did not arrange for the provision of physician services 24 hours a
day, for emergencies, what was the impact on residents?
DEFICIENCY CATEGORIZATION §483.30(c)
Example of Level 4, immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety, includes, but
is not limited to:
• The attending physician, who was the only physician of the facility and the
medical director, failed to have an alternate physician or non-physician
practitioner available for the residents in case of an emergency, when he left the
country. The facility did not have an agreement with another physician to provide
physician services in the absence of the attending physician. When a resident with
a known history of congestive heart failure developed edema in the lower
extremities, the facility did not have a physician to contact for consultation and
new orders for interventions, resulting in hospitalization of the resident.
Example of level 3, actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy includes, but is not
limited to:
• The facility received laboratory results indicating that a resident had a urinary
tract infection (UTI). Attempts to contact the attending physician were
unsuccessful, and the facility did not have an alternate physician on-call for
emergencies. The facility did not secure timely medical treatment at the local
hospital or alternate medical facility for the resident resulting in progression of the
infection before interventions were implemented.
Example of Level 2, no actual harm, with potential for than more than minimal
harm, that is not immediate jeopardy, includes, but is not limited to:
• The facility failed to ensure the physician responded promptly to notification of a
resident’s fall. Phone calls from the licensed nurses about the fall and the swelling
of the left ankle were not returned for 24-hours and the facility did not secure
alternate medical intervention for the resident during this time.
Example of Level 1, no actual harm with potential for no more than a minor
negative impact on the resident, includes, but is not limited to:
• The failure of the facility to provide physician services 24-hours a day, in case of
an emergency, places the resident at risk for more than minimal harm. Therefore,
Severity Level 1 does not apply for this regulatory requirement.
History
Rev. 173, Issued: 11-22-17, Effective: 11-28-17, Implementation: 11-28-17
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
6d94891c565d8947a35770773411a9acfcddfe29aa6785e8baeeb4c62498ccee
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.