US · guidance
CMS SOM App. N, Tag N0188
§483.370(a) Within 24 hours after the use of the restraint or seclusion, staff involved in
an emergency safety intervention and the resident must have a face-to-face discussion.
This discussion must include all staff involved in the intervention except when the
presence of a particular staff person may jeopardize the wellbeing of the resident.
Other staff and the resident’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s) may participate in the
discussion when it is deemed appropriate by the facility. The facility must conduct
such discussion in a language that is understood by the resident and by the resident’s
parent(s) or legal guardian(s). The discussion must provide both the resident and staff
the opportunity to discuss the circumstances resulting in the use of restraint or
seclusion and strategies to be used by the staff, the resident, or others that could
prevent the future use of restraint or seclusion.
Interpretive Guidelines§ 483.370(a)
The purpose of the debriefing is to provide both the resident and the staff an opportunity
to analyze the events surrounding the emergency safety situation and intervention. It is
essential that facilities include all four factors of §§483.370 (b)(1)-(4) in their debriefing,
as well as review the emergency safety situation and intervention, in order to improve the
resident’s treatment plan.
Review of sample resident records to verify that the documentation of both the resident
debriefing and the staff debriefing include:
a. That a face to face debriefing was held within 24 hours of the conclusion of the
restraint or seclusion episode;
b. Appropriate staff (and their names) were involved in the face to face debriefing (if
one or more of the staff involved in the restraint or seclusion does not attend the face
to face, there must be documentation to justify their absence):
c. That the resident was present for the debriefing;
d. If the resident is a minor, the parents or legal guardians were notified and given an
opportunity to participate in the debriefing;
e. The meeting discussion includes documentation of how an restraint or seclusion may
be prevented in the future based upon information learned from the episode; and
f. Any changes to the resident’s treatment plan as a result of each debriefing.
History
Rev. 131; Issued: 01-16-15, Effective: 01-16-15, Implementation: 01-16-15
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
6199c0197e1f075ac2766ad2ff08e9e0833d8203bace424e91b3290fe3d0143c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.