US · guidance
CMS SOM App. M, Tag L503
§418.52(a)(2) - The hospice must comply with the requirements of subpart I of part
489 of this chapter regarding advance directives. The hospice must inform and
distribute written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance
directives, including a description of applicable State law.
Interpretive Guidelines §418.52(a)(2)
Advance directives generally refer to written statements or instructions, completed in
advance of a serious illness, about how an individual wants medical decisions made. The
two most common forms of advance directives are a living will and a durable medical
power of attorney for health care. It is the patient’s right to formulate an advance
directive should he/she wish to do so. The patient’s desire not to formulate an advance
directive, nor the contents of an advance directive should not affect admission to hospice.
There may be State specific requirements for advance directives that the hospice must
follow.
The hospices’ obligations under 42 CFR 489.102 include the following requirements:
Hospices must maintain written policies and procedures concerning advance directives
with respect to all adult individuals receiving medical care by or through the provider and
are required to:
(1) Provide written information to such individuals concerning:
(i) An individual's rights under State law (whether statutory or recognized by the
courts of the State) to make decisions concerning such medical care, including
the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and the right to
formulate, at the individual's option, advance directives. Providers are
permitted to contract with other entities to furnish this information but are still
legally responsible for ensuring that the requirements of this section are met.
Providers are to update and disseminate amended information as soon as
possible, but no later than 90 days from the effective date of the changes to
State law; and
(ii) The written policies of the provider or organization respecting the implementation
of such rights, including a clear and precise statement of limitation if the
provider cannot implement an advance directive based on conscience. At a
minimum, a provider's statement of limitation should:
(A) Clarify any differences between institution-wide conscience objections and
those that may be raised by individual physicians;
(B) Identify the state legal authority permitting such objection, and
(C) Describe the range of medical conditions or procedures affected by the
conscience objection.
(2) Document in a prominent part of the individual's current medical record, or patient
care record in the case of an individual in a religious nonmedical health care
institution, whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;
(3) Not condition the provision of care or otherwise discriminate against an individual
based on whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;
(4) Ensure compliance with requirements of State law (whether statutory or recognized
by the courts of the State) regarding advance directives. The provider must inform
individuals that complaints concerning the advance directive requirements may be
filed with the State survey and certification agency;
(5) Provide for education of staff concerning its policies and procedures on advance
directives, and
(6) Provide for community education regarding issues concerning advance directives that
may include material required in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, either directly or in
concert with other providers and organizations. Separate community education
materials may be developed and used, at the discretion of providers. The same
written materials do not have to be provided in all settings, but the material should
define what constitutes an advance directive, emphasizing that an advance directive
is designed to enhance an incapacitated individual's control over medical treatment,
and describe applicable State law concerning advance directives. A provider must
be able to document its community education efforts.
Hospices must furnish this information to the patient at the time of initial receipt of
hospice care by the individual from the hospice. Hospices:
1. Are not required to provide care that conflicts with an advance directive; and
2. Are not required to implement an advance directive if, as a matter of conscience, it
cannot implement an advance directive and State law allows the hospice to
conscientiously object.
If an adult individual is incapacitated at the time of admission or at the start of care and is
unable to receive information (due to the incapacitating conditions or a mental disorder)
or articulate whether or not he or she has executed an advance directive, then the hospice
may give advance directive information to the individual's family or surrogate in the
same manner that it issues other materials about policies and procedures to the family of
the incapacitated individual or to a surrogate or other concerned persons in accordance
with State law. The hospice is not relieved of its obligation to provide this information to
the individual once he or she is no longer incapacitated or unable to receive such
information. Follow-up procedures must be in place to provide the information to the
individual directly at the appropriate time.
Compliance with the advance directives requirements is necessary for continued
participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
History
Rev. 210; Issued:02-03-23; Effective:02-03-23; Implementation:02-03-23
Provenance
- Source
- cms.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-22
- Edition
- som-2026-07-22
- Content hash
8cbdfe2f1fd780061deb626fc44e4e9c11366e1a7b724b9a41e7b8b3b7b9f77e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.